12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SEC.11.10] REASONS FOR AN R-F PACKAGE 419<br />

cuit with the standard intermediate frequency being used—for example,<br />

30 Mc/sec. Anerror inthedifference frequency produces a voltage that<br />

isapplied tothe reflector of the local oscillator in sucha sense as to bring<br />

the local oscillator into correct tune. Because of the close connection<br />

of the whole AFC problem with receiver design, consideration of this<br />

subject is deferred to Sec. 12.7.<br />

MOUNTING<br />

THE R-F PARTS<br />

Experience has demonstrated that good radar performance depends<br />

not only on a well-designed set of microwave components but also on a<br />

properly coordinated mounting of them, relative to each other and relative<br />

to the other parts of the radar. Therefore it is necessary to add to<br />

the treatment already given of the components themselves a consideration<br />

of the engineering reasons for the accepted practice of grouping<br />

certain vital components in a major unit called the “r-f head. ”<br />

11.10. Reasons for an R-f Package. Preferred Grouping oj Components.—Considerations<br />

of accessibility and convenience would often<br />

argue for putting most of the components of a radar set near the indicator<br />

rather than near the antenna, which, in order to get the proper view,<br />

must usually be at a remote or isolated point. However, the long-line<br />

eflect discussed in Sec. 11”1 makes a long transmission line from magnetron<br />

to antenna something to be avoided if possible. In addition to the<br />

fact that in a long line even a moderately low standing-wave ratio can<br />

cause instabilityy in the magnetron, the extra junctions, bends, and elbows<br />

needed for a long line are themselves likely to add to the mismatch.<br />

Furthermore, as seen from Table 11”1, the r-f attenuation in a long line,<br />

particularly at the higher microwave frequencies, results in the loss of<br />

several decibels when two-way transmission is considered.<br />

The shortest possible r-f line is realized by mounting the magnetron<br />

on the back of the antenna reflector (“back-of-the-dish system”). This<br />

ideal arrangement is often not practical because of a group of components<br />

functionally associated with the magnetron which may be too large and<br />

heavy for the antenna mount to carry. The pulse transformer must be<br />

adjacent to the magnetron to avoid 1ong high-voltage leads, which would<br />

have to be supported and properly insulated and would add unwanted<br />

capacity. The duplexer T-junction and the TR tube must, of course,<br />

go in the magnetron-antenna line. The extremely low-level echo signals<br />

coming through the TR tube must be converted to the intermediate<br />

frequency and amplified considerably before being transmitted to a<br />

remote point. The local oscillator must be close, because the AFC is<br />

based on a comparison of the frequency of the local oscillator and that of<br />

the ruagnetron.<br />

Electrical and functional considerations dictate, then, that the follow-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!