12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

458 THE RECEIVING SYSTEM—RADAR RECEIVERS [SEC.12%<br />

or like the noise produced in the receiver, the more difficult it is to discriminate<br />

against.<br />

One type of interference that must be guarded against is “hash,”<br />

from rotating machinery and steep pulse wavefronts, which may leak<br />

into the i-f amplifier. Strict attention must be paid to shielding, and<br />

all leads into the receiver must be properly filtered and bypassed,<br />

Perhaps the most fundamental AJ provisions are those that will<br />

permit the receiver to operate in the presence of considerable amounts of<br />

c-w power. If the second detector is directly coupled to the video<br />

amplifier, then a very small amount<br />

RFC 51 ##f of c-w signal will develop enough<br />

voltage across the detector to bias the<br />

first video stage out of its operating<br />

range. This can be avoided by developing<br />

an equal amount of counterbias,<br />

or by coupling the detector to<br />

2nd<br />

detector the video amplifier through a block-<br />

Fm. 12.14.—Fast-time-oonstantcircuit. ing condenser. The latter course is<br />

much simpler and usually is the one<br />

adopted. The receiver WN now continue to function in the presence of a<br />

c-w simal until the i-f amplifier is overloaded. The i-f overload limit<br />

can be increased by opera~ing the last stage or two with higher platesupply<br />

voltage. Frequently a power tube, such as the 6AG7, is used in<br />

the last stage to increase the output capabilities of the i-f amplifier,<br />

although the 6AK5 has proven fairly satisfactory in this application. A<br />

rather wide video bandwidth (at least as wide as the total i-f bandwidth)<br />

is necessary when the frequent y of the jamming signal is not the same as<br />

that of the radar transmitter. Use of a linear detector will also give the<br />

i-f amplifier a greater dynamic range. In some receivers it is necessary<br />

to apply a “gate,” which sensitizes the receiver during a certain interval<br />

of time. It is desirable that such gating be tione in the video amplifier<br />

rather than in the i-f amplifier, to avoid generating a pulse when a c-w<br />

signal is present. Finally, the operation of the gain control early in the<br />

i-f amplifier is of value when strong c-w signals are present. The gain<br />

control should be of a type that does not reduce the output capabilities<br />

of the cent rolled stages; grid gain cent rol is satisfactory in this respect.<br />

The precautions mentioned thus far constitute good design practice<br />

and can well be included in any radar receiver. To protect against either<br />

frequency- or amplitude-modulated c-w signals, such precautions are still<br />

necessary but not quite sufficient. In addition, there is needed between<br />

the detector and video amplifier a filter that will pass individual pulses<br />

but not the c-w modulation frequencies. Several types of filter have<br />

been tried; the simplest is the fast time constant (FTC) circuit shown in<br />

Fig. 12.14.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!