12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SEC. 3.8] RET UliN FltOM 1 W’O iSoTRoPl C TARGETS 73<br />

When absorbent materials are applied to targets whose cross section<br />

is mainly specula~, the cross section is reduced by the factor \R\~—aresult<br />

that is confirmed by field tests.<br />

The manner in which absorbent materials influence the diffraction<br />

cross section is shown in Fig. 3,5. The diffraction pattern of a small<br />

plate exhibits a strong maximum at an angle corresponding to that for<br />

specular reflection, and at other angles fails off with the oscillations shown.<br />

If the plate is covered with absorbing material of high refractive index,<br />

the principal diffraction maximum is greatly reduced whereas the secondary<br />

maximum is in general only slightly changed. Covering the plate<br />

with magnet ic material of low refractive index not only reduces the<br />

principal diffraction maximum, but also makes the secondary maxima<br />

considerably lower. Generally speaking, material of high refractive<br />

index can be expected to reduce the specular cross section while it leaves<br />

the diffraction cross section substantially unaltered. Magnetic material<br />

of low refractive index may, however, also effect a reduction in the<br />

diffraction cross section.<br />

COMPLICATED TARGETS<br />

BY A. J. F. SIEGERT AND E. M.<br />

PURCELL<br />

Most targets are much more complicated than those dealt with in the<br />

previous sections. A distinction will be made between ‘‘ complex targets”<br />

and “compound targets” (Sec. 310). The latter term denotes targets<br />

consisting of many independent elements (rain, vegetation) which<br />

generally fill the volume illuminated by a “pulse packet” (Sec. 4.2)<br />

completely. The former denotes complicated targets (such as ships, aircraft,<br />

and structures) which are large, but still smaller than the illuminated<br />

region. The power received from compound targets is thus dependent<br />

on beamwidth and pulse length, since these govern the size of the pulse<br />

packet; the signal from a complex target is not.<br />

3.8. Return from Two Isotropic Targets.—The outstanding features<br />

of the signal returned from complex targets—its fluctuations and its<br />

wavelength dependence-can be studied by considering a simple model<br />

consisting of two equal isotropic targets a distance 1apart. This distance<br />

is assumed to be smaller than c7/2, where ~ is the pulse duration, so that<br />

the signals overla~at least partly. The ratio of the received power<br />

from the two targets to that which would be received from one of the<br />

targets alone (at a distance large compared with 1) is given by<br />

g = 1,%+3””’) +.%(’-;””’’ )12<br />

“COS2(+’) ‘++4+ ’)1 ’23)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!