12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.<br />

712 RADAR RELAY [SEC. 17.9<br />

Such a method would be extremely advantageous if multiple sets<br />

of angular data were to be relayed.<br />

3. Pulse methods are inherently more accurate than c-w methods<br />

since they involve either” counting” or the measurement of time<br />

probably the most accurate types of physical measurements that<br />

can be made. Furthermore, no dependence whatever is placed on<br />

the linearity of r-f modulators, amplifiers, detectors, etc., in contrast<br />

to the c-w methods where all such devices must be extremely<br />

linear and free from dk.tortion.<br />

On the other hand, c-w methods involve somewhat simpler terminal<br />

equipment than do the puke methods. They are also much less susceptible<br />

to pulse interference, which is the type most likely to be met with at<br />

most of the radio frequencies involved.<br />

Comparison of Specijic Methods.—The specific synchronization<br />

methods that have bee~ most thoroughly tested are—<br />

1. The conveying of sine and cosine by pulses.<br />

2. The conveying of angular increments by the modulator pulses.<br />

3. The conveying of angular increments by the sinusoidally varied<br />

pulse.<br />

4. The method of phase-shifted pulses.<br />

5. The conveying of sine and cosine by a-f signals of different frequencies.<br />

Certain qualitative comparisons among these are possible.<br />

The method of relaying angular increments by modulator-pulse timing<br />

is by far the simplest if it can be used, which is only when the scanner<br />

rotates very uniformly and can be exactly synchronized with the modulator.<br />

Unfortunately, the tests of thk method were made in connection<br />

with an airborne radar in which the scanning rate varied considerably;<br />

hence appreciable inertia could not be used. Furthermore, multiplepulse<br />

coding had not been adopted at that time. As a result, interference<br />

led to somewhat erratic results. Since no opportunity has arisen for<br />

testing with a proper radar and with coded pukes, it is difficult to make an<br />

accurate assessment, but the comparative success under unfavorable<br />

conditions indicates that when properly applied the method can be<br />

satisfactory.<br />

If the scanning is fairly uniform but cannot be synchronized with the<br />

modulator, the method of the sinusoidally varied pulse (Sec. 17.5) gives<br />

very satisfactory results with a minimum of complexity as proved by a<br />

reasonable amount of testing (See. 17.15). This method is somewhat less<br />

susceptible to interference effects than Method 2 since more data are<br />

sent per radar cycle and since an extra pulse does not cause an irreversible<br />

effect.<br />

The method of relaying sine and cosine data by pulse-timing tech-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!