12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

612 EXAMPLES OF RADAR SYSTEM DESIGN [SEC. 15.12<br />

of microwave radar suggested that if such facilities could be incorporated<br />

in aircraft whose primary mission had little to do with radar—transpo~t<br />

aircraft, for exampl~they could serve an important navigational<br />

purpose. Since radar in this application is a very great convenience<br />

rather than an imperative operational necessity, it must make the<br />

minimum demands on the aircraft in terms of weight, drag, power consumption,<br />

and attention required from air and ground crew.<br />

Existing microwave radar scarcely met these requirements in 1943.<br />

For example, the AN/APQ-13, a bombing radar whose manufacture<br />

was just beginning at the end of that year, has an installed weight of<br />

620 lb without its special bombing facilities, and requires 100 amp of<br />

28-volt aircraft power. It has 24 controls to be adjusted, omitting those<br />

concerned with its bombing function. Forty-two cables are required to<br />

interconnect its 19 separate component boxes. It is clearly uneconomic<br />

to install such an equipment as ,one of several navigational aids in an<br />

aircraft whose primary mission is not high-altitude bombing.<br />

Thus, the design of a new set for this navigational use was indicated;<br />

and it appeared that by careful attention to every detail such a set might<br />

be made simple enough, light enough, and convenient enough to come<br />

into widespread use. The equipment that resulted is the AN/APS-10.<br />

Performance Requirements.—As always, the range performance of the<br />

radar was the principal initial requirement. The following ranges<br />

(in nautical miles) on various targets were taken as being comfortably<br />

over the minimum necessary for navigation even of a high-speed airplane.<br />

Ground painting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..25 t030<br />

Cities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..30 t050<br />

Storm clouds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10t040<br />

Mountains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..25 t030<br />

5000-ton ship. . . . . . . . . . . ...25<br />

Ground beacons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 (if not limited by horizon)<br />

Portable ground beacons (low power). 115 (if not limited by horizon)<br />

Since rearward vision is usually as important in radar navigation<br />

as forward vision, it was concluded that the set should have a full 360°<br />

azimuth scan. In order that the appearance and location of nearby<br />

targets should not change too much between scans in an airplane traveling<br />

4 to 6 miles/min, only a few seconds could be allowed per scanner rotation.<br />

On the other hand, a reasonable number of pulses per beamwidth<br />

had to be allowed.<br />

Requirements on the antenna pattern were relatively simple. The<br />

beamwidth in azimuth had to be as narrow as possible, to afford good<br />

resolution of targets on the ground. The elevation pattern was required<br />

to give the most uniform ground coverage possible throughout the normal<br />

flying altitudes: from 1000 to 10,000 ft.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!