12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

542 THE REG’EI VI.VG SYSTE,JI—I.VDICA TORS [SEC. 13.17<br />

and is therefore proportional to the time integral of E. When E reaches<br />

the desired maximum value, the switch is closed and V1 is disconnected.<br />

The sudden termination of its current results in an oscillation of L and its<br />

associated capacity. The plate end of the inductance swings positive,<br />

disconnecting V, as the potential rises past the 200-volt level. On the<br />

down-swing, V2 becomes conducting again and clamps the inductance to<br />

the 200-volt point, resulting in the waveform shown. The amplitude of<br />

the oscillation is dependent upon the energy stored in the inductance at<br />

the end of the sawtooth, which in turn is determined by the current and<br />

hence by the “area” under the sawtooth. It can be rigorously proved<br />

by analysis that this amplitude must be such that the average voltage<br />

across the inductance (neglecting its resistance) is zero during the waveform.<br />

We shall be content with the general statement that this must<br />

be so since, in the absence of resistance, the average potential across<br />

an inductance during a completely closed cycle must be zero regardless of<br />

waveform. Therefore in this case the initial, the average, and the final<br />

values of the waveform are identical and it is “balanced” as desired.<br />

A complete circuit using this method is illustrated in Fig. 13.50. The<br />

Miller circuit is switched by the double-diode clamp Vs, Vi, which in turn<br />

is controlled by the cathode-coupled flopover VI, Vj. The latter is<br />

automatically terminated at a fixed sawtooth amplitude by the signal<br />

passed through the biased diode Vs. The Miller circuit is like that<br />

described in connection with Fig. 1349, except that V, (V, of Fig. 13-49)<br />

is biased somewhat below 200 volts, thereby introducing a small correction<br />

to take care of inadequacies in the response of the deflection system.<br />

The potentiometer P1 allows a wide variation in the sweep speed used,<br />

and Ps adjusts the pattern to proper size.<br />

The amplifier uses negative feedback of a signal taken across a resistor<br />

in the transformer secondary, thereby correcting for deficiencies in transformer<br />

response. In contrast to previous cases, the final stage of the<br />

amplifier is driven negative during the actual sweep; thus the induced<br />

voltage on the plate is positive and the tube does not “bog down. ” The<br />

high potential needed for quick recovery ~vhen the current is rising again<br />

is provided by the joint action of L1 and Cl. During the saw-tooth a large<br />

positive voltage is induced in L1, and Cl is charged accordingly. When<br />

the current derivative reverses at the end of the sawtooth, the voltage is<br />

temporarily maintained at a high level by C,, and, in spite of the induced<br />

voltage across the transformer, the plate of the tube remains at a workable<br />

voltage level during the rapid back-swing. The choice of polarities<br />

is such that the interval in which Cl aids the plate supply is short.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!