12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

312 ANTENNAS, SCANNERS, AND STABILIZATION [SEC. 919<br />

may not be line-of-sight stabilized. If this airplane banks, the relative<br />

bearing of ground targets will be, as we shall see, falsely indicated. For<br />

example, let us consider the case of an airplane banking for a right turn,<br />

the relative bearing of the beam being straight ahead. It is clear that<br />

since the fan is perpendicular to the floor of the airplane it is not at the<br />

moment vertical, and that therefore the targets on the straight line on<br />

the ground now being illuminated by the beam are not at zero bearing.<br />

Since such targets are nevertheless displayed as if at zero bearing, the<br />

display is distorted; these targets are shifted by an amount equal to the<br />

altitude of the airplane multiplied by the tangent of the bank angle.<br />

Other targets are less seriously disturbed, those at 90° and 270° being<br />

correctly indicated on a banking airplane.<br />

Two methods have been considered for correcting the airborne decktilt<br />

error. One method is so to stabilize the antenna that the plane of the<br />

fan beam remains indeed vertical. This can be accomplished by stablebase<br />

stabilization or by a three-axis mount. The other method is by<br />

data stabilization, and several circuits have been devised for removing<br />

the distortion if supplied with voltages depending on the angles involved.<br />

None of these circuits has been incorporated in systems now in wide use,<br />

although one radar designed for production incorporates a feature that<br />

accurately corrects the display at the one target designated as the aiming<br />

point.<br />

9.19. Installation of Airborne Scanners.-In discussing antenna<br />

installations we will treat first the airborne case. Here, one of the pressing<br />

problems is the choice of location. The radar must have the unobstructed<br />

“vision” required for its operation, and its antenna should be so<br />

installed that it may be housed in an aerodynamically acceptable radome.<br />

A very common requirement is circular vision of the ground well out<br />

toward the horizon, as in Fig. 9%. The only good location is then below<br />

the fuselage. If rearward vision is not required, an antenna with circular<br />

scan can be mounted just behind and below the nose of the airplane, where<br />

the radome can be completely faircd in.<br />

Scanning of only a forward sector is possible if the antenna is mounted<br />

in the nose. Such a location is impossible in single-engine airplanes, and<br />

external housing becomes necessary. Aerodynamically, perhaps the<br />

best site in this category is at a wing tip, although a blister faired into a<br />

leading edge has been widely used. For maintenance reasons easy<br />

replacement of the set is desirable; this has been accomplished in one<br />

instance by packaging the greater part of the set in a “bomb” suspended<br />

under one wing. In the aircraft-interception radar of nightfighters the<br />

scanner is located for vision in all generally forward directions. Such<br />

scanners can be mounted in any of the locations that are good for sector<br />

scanners. Bomber-borne scanners for protective fire control are located

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!