12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

228 THE EMPLOYMENT OF RADAR DA 1’.4 [SEC. 75<br />

from this point. The detailed control of fighter interceptors was carried<br />

out from group and sector headquarters, where plots were maintained on<br />

the basis of information repeated from Fighter Command Headquarters.<br />

The operation of this system was much more difficult than might be<br />

inferred from this brief description. If the CH stations had been perfect,<br />

it would still have been difficult to interpret some hundreds of plots every<br />

minute, all subject to variable delays and to the personal errors of the<br />

observers. Quite trivial difficulties proved surprisingly hard to overcome.<br />

It was hard to find room for all the plotters around the table.<br />

They could not plot fast enough. They might disturb one set of plots<br />

when they leaned over to plot another aircraft. Such rather simple<br />

difficulties could be, and often were, the limiting factors on the use that<br />

could be made of the radar plots, and an intensive study of all the stages<br />

in plotting and filtering was made throughout the early years of the<br />

war.<br />

Despite the large number of people necessary to this system, and its<br />

prodigal use of telephone land lines for the telling of plots, its operational<br />

limitations were severe. Under conditions of moderate aircraft density,<br />

a good filter officer with a good organization could filter plots with an<br />

accuracy of perhaps 70 per cent. When plots were sparse, the accuracy<br />

was excellent, and the on]y objection to the system was its unavoidable<br />

time lag in reporting. Under conditions of high aircraft density, the<br />

system broke down, and it was commonplace to cease reporting in certain<br />

areas where the density was so high that filtering was impossible.<br />

In spite of these handicaps, very considerable success attended the<br />

use of this system in the Battle of Britain and thereafter. A tendency<br />

grew to forget that the main reason for organizing the reporting and control<br />

system in this centralized way was that a single radar could not be<br />

relied on to give a sufficiently complete or accurate picture of events<br />

in the air. The great technical improvements of 1943 and early 1944<br />

resulted in long-range, high-definition microwave radar having good<br />

coverage if proper] y sited. This improved equipment made it possible<br />

to depend on a single radar installation for a substantially complete<br />

picture of the air situation.<br />

Delays and errors unavoidable in a complicated scheme of telling and<br />

plotting are largely eliminated in a system that combines the operational<br />

organization with the radar equipment. Controllers who give instructions<br />

to aircraft are able to work directly from the radar display and<br />

therefore have a far more accurate and up-to-date appreciation of the<br />

situation than can be obtained from a plot, however well maintained it<br />

may be. This was eventually appreciated, and such systems have been<br />

put into very successful operation. Such a system is described in the<br />

following section.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!