12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SEC. 922] STREA MLIA”ING 315<br />

function, radome materials, transmission of radar energy, structural<br />

requirements, aerodynamics, access to the radome cavity, and specification<br />

and test.<br />

In this discussion only the three major items—aerodynamics, electrical<br />

transmission, and structural design—will be discussed, and these<br />

only briefly. N’one of these items can take preeminence over the others<br />

since a design aerodynamically or structurally poor can prevent the radar<br />

set from being useful, just as would a radome that had faulty transmission<br />

characteristics. The radome design must, therefore, be a compromise<br />

of these three major factors if accuracy and effectiveness of the airborne<br />

unit are to be secured.<br />

9.22. Streamlining. -There is no simple foolproof answer to the<br />

aerodynamical problem. Each installation has peculiarities of its own,<br />

depending upon its location on the airplane in question, the plane itself,<br />

the speed of the plane, and the size and shape of the radome. A few<br />

simple considerations can be set forth but the real answer can only result<br />

from careful test in a wind tunnel.<br />

Although, from an electrical viewpoint, the circular cylinder is the<br />

most desirable shape for a radome, aerodynamically it is objectionable<br />

due to its high drag. By streamlining a cylinder its air resistance can be<br />

reduced to a sixth or less. Any radome extending beyond the fuselage<br />

line of the airplane should therefore be streamlined.<br />

The drag for a protuberance of given shape increases in approximate<br />

proportion to its frontal area. It is therefore desirable to reduce the<br />

projected area of the radome as much as possible even to the extent of<br />

having the radome surface coincide with the skin of the plane.<br />

If a protuberance is necessary, the drag can be minimized by locating<br />

the radome at a position where there is already some disturbance of the<br />

airflow. The turbulence of the air stream tends to be a maximum toward<br />

the tail of the plane. R’bile practically no protuberance is permissible<br />

near the nose of a high-speed airplane, one etiending several inches amidship<br />

or further aft may cause a hardly noticeable increase of drag.<br />

The truly satisfactory design, however, can be verified only by tests<br />

in the wind tunnel where very slight differences in aircraft performance<br />

are readily detectable. The wind-tunnel test can also be used to furnish<br />

pressure distributions on the radome surface, which are necessary for the<br />

structural design computations.<br />

The location of the antenna on the airplane must also be the result of<br />

operational requirements and compromises with the other components.<br />

For navigation and bombing it is desirable to have the antenna scan 360°<br />

in azimuth. This can best be realized in a location on the belly of the<br />

-e about midship, but generally only by adding a large protuberance.<br />

A location in the “chin” of the airplane offers a more favorable location

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!