12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 C-W RADAR SYSTE.JfS [SEC. 58<br />

give rise to a beat’ j~, as shown in the bottom graph of Fig. 5.12. Plainly<br />

enough, the greater the target distance, the greater this beat frequency;<br />

its magnitude is then a direct measure of the range. The signal of this<br />

frequency is therefore amplified and limited, and the frequency measured,<br />

usually by a cycle-counting device of some sort. The frequency meter<br />

is then calibrated in terms of range.<br />

.2<br />

Such a system would work, as described, and would also work on<br />

multiple targets. But linear frequency modulation is not easy, and<br />

for single targets the operation is not greatly affected by a change from<br />

linear to sinusoidal frequency modulation. The difference frequency<br />

then varies sinusoidally with time,<br />

but the important point remains,<br />

namely that the mean magnitude<br />

of the difference frequency depends<br />

on the range. Sinusoidal<br />

frequency modulation is therefore e ~<br />

adopted since it requires simpler 2<br />

r<br />

apparatus and accomplishes the ~<br />

same result.<br />

There is one subtlety that is<br />

worth some discussion. If the +<br />

I<br />

mean or carrier frequency were an FIG 5.12.—The upper figure shows, in<br />

integral multiple of the modulator the full line curve, the instantaneous transfrequency,<br />

it is obvious that the<br />

mitter frequency as a function of time. The<br />

dotted curve is the received frequency. The<br />

output of the mixer would be lower figure shows the difference, or beat,<br />

periodic with periodicity correquencies,<br />

between<br />

as<br />

‘ransmi%d<br />

a funct]on<br />

and.<br />

of time.<br />

‘e’eived ‘r!-<br />

The horLsponding<br />

to the modulating fre- zontal axisin the upper figurecorrespondsto<br />

quency. This would mean that<br />

the meantransmitterfrequencyf~.<br />

each modulation period would contain the sa’me number of cycles.<br />

This number is then integral and we see that the frequency meter can<br />

read only 1, 2, . . “ , n times the modulating frequency. Actually,<br />

the same conclusion holds even with no special relation between modulation<br />

and carrier frequencies, if, as is usual, we use a cycle-counting type<br />

of frequency meter. Naturally, it is of interest to translate this stepwise<br />

behavior of the frequency meter into altitude readings. For the<br />

linear-modulation case we easily find j ~= 4j,Ajh/c with f, the modulating<br />

frequency, Af the total frequency swing, f. the beat frequency,<br />

and h the height. Solving for the height and introducing the fact that<br />

f. is quantized in steps of f,, we find for the error 6h<br />

1It isbeats of this sort,whichmay be describedasdueto time-delaydemodulation<br />

of F.M,that are regardedas spurioussignalsin the system describedin Sec. 5.6 and<br />

that must be avoided by reducing FM of the transmitterto the lowest possible<br />

value

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!