12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

592 EXAMPLES OF RADAR SYSTEM DESIGN [SEC, 153<br />

rwmber of such surveys of ground, ship, and airborne 10-cm and 3-cm<br />

radars during the years 1943 and 1944. The radar performance figure<br />

of the average set tested was 14 or 15 db below the rated value for the<br />

radar. Since a performance-figure deficit of 12 db results in cutting the<br />

maximum range of the set on aircraft by a factor of 2 (Fig. 15.1), poor<br />

radar performance was responsible for a loss of more than half the<br />

tactical usefulness of the systems tested. Figure 15.3 shows the findings<br />

of a more recent (July 1945) survey covering 10-cm ship radars; it indicates<br />

that there had been no change for the better.<br />

Such serious deficiencies in actual field radar performance emphasize<br />

the fact that the use of test equipment to measure performance and to<br />

trace down the causes of impaired performance had not been incorporated<br />

into routine maintenance practice for most radar sets at the end of the<br />

L<br />

01<br />

o 10 20 30 40<br />

Oedels below rated performance<br />

?<br />

%6<br />

*<br />

z<br />

~4<br />

2<br />

22<br />

0k<br />

o 10 20 30 40<br />

Oeabels below rated performance<br />

FIG. 15.2.—<strong>Radar</strong> performance surveys, FIG. 15.3.—<strong>Radar</strong> performance survey,<br />

1943–1 944. July 1945.<br />

war. Such important losses in performance are glaringly inconsistent<br />

with the great effort expended in radar design to attain high performance.<br />

In the design of new equipment, it is essential to make careful provision<br />

for adequate testing and trouble-shooting; in the use of existing equipment<br />

it is equally important to be sure that routine maintenance procedure is<br />

sufficient to keep the radar within a few decibels of rated performance.<br />

The design and use of test equipment is treated in detail in Vol. 23 of<br />

this series.<br />

DESIGN OF A HIGH-PERFORMANCE RADAR FOR<br />

AIR SURVEILLANCEAND CONTROL<br />

15.3. Initial Planning and Objectives. Formtdation of Requirements.<br />

At a relatively early stage in the development of microwave techniques<br />

consideration was given to the possibility of applying them to the problem<br />

of long-range air surveillance. Greatly improved azimuth resolution,<br />

minimization of ground “ clutter, ” and improved low-angle coverage were<br />

the principal advantages that microwaves appeared to offer, The best

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!