12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

58 THE RADAR EQUATION [SEC.2.15<br />

not require total reflection at CD to get appreciable guiding for a considerable<br />

distance. Nor does the source of radiation have to lie within<br />

the duct to permit a portion of the energy to be partially trapped in the<br />

duct, although it may not be too far above it. The variation of field<br />

strength with distance from the transmitter and height above the surface<br />

is very complicated, and to cover this type of propagation by a mere<br />

modification of the radar equation is entirely out of the question, as the<br />

reader who pursues this subject into Vol. 13, where it is treated at length,<br />

will learn. It is perhaps best here to summarize the aspects of superrcfraction<br />

which have a significant bearing on radar planning and design.<br />

1. The guiding of microwaves by refractive anomalies of the duct<br />

type appears to be the sole means by which coverage beyond the horizon<br />

can be obtained. Extensions of range up to several times the horizon<br />

distance have often been observed.<br />

2. The most prevalent, the best understood, and probably the most<br />

important example of the type is associated with the surface evaporation<br />

duct, which seems to exist most of the time over large areas of the oceans<br />

of the world.<br />

3. Short wavelengths are required to take advantage of the guiding<br />

effects of ducts, and, for surface ducts, low antenna (and target) heights.<br />

This is especially true of the evaporation duct.<br />

4. Substandard as well as superstandard radar ranges can be caused by<br />

refractive anomalies, if the transmission path is nearly horizontal.<br />

5. Propagation at angles steeper than a few degrees with respect<br />

to the horizontal is not affected by the refractive anomalies here discussed.<br />

2.15. Attenuation of Microwaves in the Atmosphere.—The earth’s<br />

atmosphere, excluding the ionosphere, is for all practical purposes<br />

transparent to radio waves of frequency lower than 1000 llc/sec. Even<br />

over a transmission path hundreds of miles long no appreciable fraction<br />

of the energy in the radio wave is lost by absorption or scattering in the<br />

atmosphere. With the extension of the useful range of radio frequencies<br />

into the microwave region we have at last entered a part 01 the electromagnetic<br />

spectrum to which the atmosphere is not wh 011y transparent.<br />

Indeed an upper limit to frequencies useful for radar, imposed by the<br />

properties of the atmosphere, is now within sight. The radar engineer<br />

must therefore acquaint himself with certain phenomena falling heretofore<br />

within the exclusive province of the molecular spectroscopist.<br />

Broadly speaking, there are two ways in which energy can be dissipated<br />

from a radar beam: (1) by direct absorption of energy in the<br />

gases of the atmosphere; (2) through absorption or scattering of energy<br />

by condensed matter such as water drops. All such processes lead to an<br />

exponential decrease of intensity with distance from the source, superimposed<br />

on, and eventually dominating, the iu~erse-square dependence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!