12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

178 THE GATHERING AND PRESENTATION OF RADAR DATA iSEC. 69<br />

station performance was never predictable from theory. It was always<br />

necessary to “calibrate” a station by an elaborate series of test flights.<br />

The maximum reliable range of a CH station was usually about 120<br />

to 150 miles on single aircraft, but the range depended very much on the<br />

skill of the operator and of the maintenance crew as well as on meteoro-<br />

40,000 /<br />

/<br />

/<br />

3 30,000<br />

/<br />

.s /<br />

/<br />

z 20,000-<br />

,*<br />

/<br />

= 10,000-<br />

/<br />

.“ ~.<br />

/ -/<br />

O 10 ‘;O- ’30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120<br />

Rangein miles<br />

FIG. 6.15.—Polar diagram of typical CH station for reliable pickup of single fighter<br />

aircraft along the line of sight. Solid line representsmain arrays; broken line represents<br />

gap-fillingarrays.<br />

logical conditions. As early as 1941 a Photographic Reconnaissance<br />

Spitfire, flying at about 40,000 ft, was plotted by the CH station at<br />

Canewdon, just north of the Thames estuary, as it flew almost all the way<br />

to Genoa at a maximum range of over 450 miles.<br />

Height-finding was performed by making use of the lobe pattern of<br />

the receiving antennas. Figure 6.16<br />

shows the vertical pattern produced<br />

by two receiving antennas, respectively<br />

at 220 and 90 ft above ground.<br />

> m<br />

~<br />

If one compares the signals received<br />

.:<br />

in these two antennas as a function of<br />

.= 9<br />

angle of elevation, one obtains a curve<br />

$ shown dotted in Fig. 6.16. It follows<br />

c<br />

that, by measuring the signal ratio,<br />

o~4<br />

it is sometimes possible to deduce<br />

the angle of elevation of the target.<br />

Elevationangle in degrees<br />

FIG, 6.16.—Relative signalstrengths The comparison was performed by<br />

from CH height-finding antennas. means of the goniometer already<br />

Wavelength = 13.22 meters. (a) Two<br />

dipoles, mean height 220 ft. (b) One described.<br />

dipole at 90 ft. (c) Ratio of (a) to (b) Under normal circumstances, the<br />

on an arbitrary scale.<br />

field coils of the tzoniometer were<br />

connected to two dipoles about 22o ft above the ground. By means of a<br />

switch, one goniometer coil was connected to a dipole at 22o ft, the other<br />

to a dipole at about 90 ft. By turning the goniometer to give minimum<br />

signal, the angle of elevation of the target could be determined and hence<br />

its height could be deduced (see Fig. 6.17).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!