12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 THE RADAR EQUATION [SEC.!2.7<br />

limitation down to wavelengths of the order of 3 cm, because ranges that<br />

can be achieved are already very great and are limited usually by the<br />

horizon rather than by the relation expressed in Eq. (14). That is to<br />

say, the condition of free-space propagation, which we have assumed in<br />

this section, often does not apply at the extremity of the microwavebeacon<br />

range.<br />

Long beacon ranges are, of course, a result of the enormous advantage<br />

of one-way over tw~way transmission. If we compare Eq. (14) with<br />

Eq. (4), we see that in signal strength for given transmitted power the<br />

beacon process enjoys the advantage of a factor of 4flJP/G+s. It is<br />

interesting to compute the limiting free-space range for a beacon operating<br />

in conjunction with a radar set of the characteristics assumed in<br />

our earlier radar example. Let us suppose that the gain of the beacon<br />

antenna is 10, and that the tranwnitted power and minimum required<br />

signal power for the beacon are the same as those assumed for the radar<br />

set. Using Eq. (14) we obtain for the maximum range, either for interrogation<br />

or reply, 60,000 statute miles.<br />

In conclusion, we may point out that Eq. (14), although it has been<br />

written in notation appropriate to the radar-beacon problem, applies, of<br />

course, to any one-way transmission problem where free-space propagation<br />

can be assumed. Applications of Eq. (14) are to be found in<br />

the fields of microwave radar relay, radar j amrning, and microwave<br />

communication.<br />

THE MINIMUM DETECTABLESIGNAL<br />

2.7. Noise.—It is well known that despite our ability to amplify<br />

a feeble electrical signal by practically any desired factor, it is still not<br />

possible to discern an arbitrarily weak signal because of the presence of<br />

random elect rical fluctuations, or “noise.” If the true signal entering<br />

any receiver is made weaker and weaker, it subsides eventually into the<br />

fluctuating background of noise and is lost. What is the origin of these<br />

fluctuations, and what factors determine precisely the level at which<br />

the radar signal is hopelessly obscured by them?<br />

Before we attempt to answer these decisive questions, it is worth<br />

while to consider briefly the limit of useful sensitivity of an ordinary<br />

low-frequency radio receiver. This limit is also set by random disturbances,<br />

but in this case the largest random disturbances with which<br />

the signal must compete originate generally not in the receiver itself<br />

but elsewhere in space. Whatever their sourc+and this may range<br />

from a passing trolley car to the mysterious reaches of interstellar<br />

spat-these disturbances enter the receiver by way of the antenna.<br />

The crucial quantity is therefore the ratio of the field strength of the<br />

signal in the neighborhood of the antenna to that of noise or interference.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!