12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SEC. 6.13] HOMING 201<br />

application, since the target speed is much higher (and much more nearly<br />

that of the intercepting aircraft), and since homing must be carried out in<br />

two dimensions instead of one.<br />

An early AI equipment was designed by the British as an extension<br />

to AI of the design principles of ASV Mark II. It was designated AI<br />

lMark IV by the British; a similar system made for the U.S. Army<br />

by an American manufacturer was called SCR-540. In this set, which<br />

operated near 200 Me/see, a single transmitting antenna sent a broad<br />

lobe in the forw-ard direction from the aircraft. Two pairs of receiving<br />

antennas were provided; one pair produced overlapping lobes like the<br />

“homing” lobes of the ASV Mark II, to give an indication (also identical<br />

with that of the ASV Mark II) of the homing error in azimuth. The<br />

other pair of lobes was used to measure homing error in elevation angle;<br />

they overlapped exactly when viewed from above the airplane, but one<br />

was displaced slightly above the center line of the airplane and the other<br />

slightly below the center line. Elevation horning error was shown on a<br />

second indicator exactly like that of the ASV Mark II, turned through<br />

90° so that the range sweep occurred horizontally from left to right.<br />

Signals from the upper lobe displaced the trace upward; those from the<br />

lower lobe displaced it downward. The receiver was rapidly switched<br />

to each of the four receiving antennas in turn, and the display corresponding<br />

y switched to the proper deflection plate of the appropriate indicator<br />

tube. Range could be read either on the azimuth tube or on the elevation<br />

tube. The arrangement of the receiving antenna patterns and of<br />

the indications is shown in Fig. 633.<br />

The principal operational limitation of this equipment was a result<br />

of the fact that very broad beams were produced by the single-dipole-andreflector<br />

antennas used. These broad beams gave strong reflections<br />

from the ground beneath the aircraft, restricting the maximum range at<br />

which aircraft echoes could be seen to less than the altitude at which the<br />

AI-equipped fighter was flying. In the case of ASV operating on 200<br />

Me/see, similar returns from the sea were experienced, but the returns<br />

from ship targets were so strong that signals were sought and tracked at<br />

ranges beyond the sea return. Aircraft echoes were many times weaker,<br />

so that aircraft could be seen only at ranges shorter than the ground<br />

return.<br />

It was clear that the best hope of escaping thk limitation was to make<br />

use of a sharper beam in AI equipment, and since the maximum antenna<br />

size was limited by the necessity of aircraft installation, considerable<br />

effort was exerted to develop a microwave AI. The American equipment<br />

which resulted is the SCR-720. In this equipment, a 29-in. paraboloid<br />

reflect or rotates continuous y in azimuth and is S1OW1 y tilted in elevation.<br />

The helical scan thus produced covers an elevation interval of 25°. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!