12.02.2014 Views

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

Radar System Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

594 EXAMPLES OF RADAR SYSTEM DESIGN [SEC. 153<br />

shows the general form of beam shape that gives the most desirable<br />

type of coverage under these conditions. Its lower edge is determined<br />

by the optical horizon, with corrections for atmospheric refraction and<br />

interference due to surface reflection. At a distance d in land miles<br />

from the radar set, the horizon height h in feet is given by h = ~dz for<br />

normal atmospheric refraction (neglecting the interference effect, which<br />

is small for microwaves; see Sec. 2.13). Reduction of the blind region<br />

below this lower edge by locating the set on high terrain maybe advantageous<br />

where the coverage is largely over water, but for overland surveillance<br />

this recourse is severely limited because of permanent echoes,<br />

which can mask out all return in regions where the radar beam is intercepted<br />

by land surfaces.<br />

4.5<br />

2:<br />

ẓ<br />

30<br />

z<br />

z 25<br />

.<br />

1<br />

g 20<br />

~ 15<br />

~ 10<br />

‘5<br />

o 0<br />

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225<br />

Rangeon singlelargeawcraftin miles<br />

FIG. 15.4.—Desirable coverage for long-range air-surveillance radar.<br />

In setting a desirable limit for the upper contour for detection of a<br />

given type of aircraft it was, necessary to balance the value of high<br />

coverage against coverage in range, since adding to one subtracts from<br />

the other unless the designer chooses to increase the complexity of the<br />

equipment. For operations duting World War II, provision for detection<br />

of a four-engine plane at all altitudes up to 35,000 ft was desirable, and<br />

this value was taken to determine the upper section CD of Fig. 15.4.<br />

Increasing the elevation angle of section AD of the contour does not add<br />

greatly to the radar coverage requirements, since the region is small;<br />

but practical difficulties of antenna design are encountered. Since<br />

close-in regions have been in the past largely masked out by permanent<br />

echoes, an angle of 30° was considered acceptable. With the upper and<br />

lower limits of the contour determined, the problem was now to push<br />

the maximum range out to the best possible value.<br />

A detection range of 180 miles for a four-engine aircraft appeared to<br />

be the best that could be expected, and the contour thus determined is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!