11.07.2014 Views

Agenda - City of Santa Monica

Agenda - City of Santa Monica

Agenda - City of Santa Monica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Community benefits have been negotiated as part <strong>of</strong> the Development Agreement. The<br />

applicant has agreed to the following community benefits for the project:<br />

• A monetary contribution <strong>of</strong> $125,493 towards transportation infrastructure<br />

improvements in the Downtown area. T his contribution is consistent with the<br />

Transportation Impact Fee formula approved by the <strong>City</strong> Council on February 26,<br />

2013.<br />

• A monetary contribution <strong>of</strong> $125,000 towards the Colorado Esplanade<br />

improvements.<br />

• A monetary contribution <strong>of</strong> $225,000 towards parks and open space.<br />

• A monetary contribution <strong>of</strong> $25,000 towards Big Blue Bus infrastructure<br />

improvements in the Downtown.<br />

• A monetary contribution <strong>of</strong> $25,000 towards Historic Preservation programs for the<br />

Downtown.<br />

• A Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan with measures applicable to<br />

both the commercial and residential components <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

• Provision <strong>of</strong> 5 EV stub-outs for charging stations within the subterranean garage.<br />

• Physical improvements consisting <strong>of</strong> a ground floor setback that widens the adjacent<br />

sidewalk.<br />

• A local hiring provision to facilitate the employment <strong>of</strong> local workers during<br />

construction and for commercial employees.<br />

Pending Community Benefits for Discussion:<br />

• Affordable Housing: The Planning Commission recommended that the project<br />

provide a total <strong>of</strong> 10 units (20%) on-site as affordable units. The level <strong>of</strong> affordability<br />

for the units would consist <strong>of</strong> five very-low income one-bedroom units, and five<br />

moderate-income studio units defined as 80% <strong>of</strong> the area median income (instead <strong>of</strong><br />

typical 100% <strong>of</strong> area median as defined by AHPP). The applicant does not agree<br />

with the Commission’s recommendation, and has elected to maintain their proposal<br />

<strong>of</strong> eight on-site affordable units (5 very-low income one-bedroom units, and 3 lowincome<br />

studio units) as proposed prior to the Commission’s review <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

The three low-income studio units would be in addition to the five very-low income<br />

units required by the AHPP.<br />

• LEED® Platinum Certification: The Planning Commission recommended that the<br />

project be designed and constructed to achieve a minimum LEED® Platinum<br />

certification as established by the LEED® Rating System. The applicant has<br />

expressed difficulties in achieving platinum status based on the project size, type,<br />

and location as an u rban infill residential project. T he applicant has agreed to<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!