03.01.2015 Views

handbook of modern sensors

handbook of modern sensors

handbook of modern sensors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 3 Physical Principles <strong>of</strong> Sensing<br />

whereas a smaller part is diffusely reflected:<br />

the combined radiated and reflected flux from area a is<br />

ρ = ρ r = (1 − ε b )ε b 0 ; (3.142)<br />

= r + ρ = ε b 0 + (1 − ε b )ε b 0 = (2 − ε b )ε b 0 . (3.143)<br />

As a result, the effective emissivity may be expressed as<br />

ε e = 0<br />

= (2 − ε b )ε b (3.144)<br />

It follows from the above that due to a single reflection, a perceived (effective)<br />

emissivity <strong>of</strong> a cavity is equal to the surface emissivity magnified by a factor <strong>of</strong><br />

(2–ε b ). Of course, there may be more than one reflection <strong>of</strong> radiation before it exits<br />

the cavity. In other words, the incident on area a flux could already be a result <strong>of</strong><br />

a combined effect from the reflectance and emittance at other parts <strong>of</strong> the cavity’s<br />

surface. The flux intensity will be higher than the originally emanated flux r .<br />

For a cavity effect to work, the effective emissivity must be attributed to the cavity<br />

opening from which radiation escapes. If a sensor is inserted into the cavity too deeply<br />

facing its wall directly, blocking the reflected rays, the cavity effect may disappear<br />

and the emissivity will be equal to that <strong>of</strong> a wall surface, which is always lower.<br />

A cavity effect will change a perceived emissivity, and if not accounted for, it may<br />

cause error in evaluation <strong>of</strong> the radiated power. To illustrate this, Fig. 3.47 shows two<br />

photographs: one is taken in visible light and the other in the mid-infrared (thermal<br />

radiation). Note that areas at the nostrils appear a little bit brighter (warmer). Yet, the<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> the skin in these spots is the same as nearby. Two wrinkles above the<br />

mustache cause a cavity effect, which increases the skin emissivity from an average<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.96 to a higher value. This enhances the intensity <strong>of</strong> the emanated thermal flux<br />

and gives an illusion <strong>of</strong> warmer skin.<br />

Fabrication <strong>of</strong> a laboratory cavity blackbody is not a trivial task. For a cavity effect<br />

to work, a blackbody must have a cavity whose surface area is much larger than the exit<br />

aperture, the shape <strong>of</strong> the cavity must allow for multiple inner reflections before the<br />

flux can escape from the aperture, and the cavity wall temperature must be uniform all<br />

over its entire surface. Figure 3.46B shows an efficient way to fabricate a blackbody<br />

Fig. 3.47. Photographs in visible light and infrared<br />

thermal radiation which is naturally emanated<br />

from the object. Note the brighter (appearing<br />

warmer) areas at the wrinkles and skin<br />

folds near the nose—a result <strong>of</strong> the cavity effect.<br />

Eyeglasses appear black (cold) because glass<br />

is opaque in the mid- and far-infrared spectral<br />

ranges and does not pass thermal radiation from<br />

the face. (Photo courtesy <strong>of</strong> Infrared Training Center,<br />

www.infraredtraining.com.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!