03.01.2015 Views

handbook of modern sensors

handbook of modern sensors

handbook of modern sensors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

References 251<br />

Fig. 6.17. Calculated and experimental<br />

amplitudes <strong>of</strong> output signals in a PIR detector.<br />

There are several conclusions which can be drawn from Eq. (6.20). The first<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the equation (the first ratio) characterizes a detector and the rest relates to an<br />

object. The pyroelectric current i is directly proportional to the temperature difference<br />

(thermal contrast) between the object and its surroundings. It is also proportional to<br />

the surface area <strong>of</strong> the object which faces the detector. A contribution <strong>of</strong> the ambient<br />

temperature T a is not as strong as it might appear from its third power. The ambient<br />

temperature must be entered in Kelvin; hence, its variations become relatively small<br />

with respect to the scale. The thinner the sensing element, the more sensitive is the<br />

detector. The lens area also directly affects signal magnitude. On the other hand,<br />

pyroelectric current does not depend on the sensor’s area as long as the lens focuses<br />

the entire image on a sensing element.<br />

To evaluate Eq. (6.20) further, let us calculate the voltage across the bias resistor.<br />

That voltage can be used as an indication <strong>of</strong> motion. We select a pyroelectric PVDF<br />

film sensor with typical properties: P = 25 µC/K m 2 , c = 2.4 × 10 6 J/m 3 K, h = 25<br />

µm, lens area a = 1cm 2 , γ = 0.6, and the bias resistor R = 10 9 (1 G). We will<br />

assume that the object’s surface temperature is 27 ◦ C and the surface area b = 0.1 m2.<br />

The ambient temperature t a = 20 ◦ C. The output voltage is calculated from Eq. (6.20)<br />

as a function <strong>of</strong> distance L from the detector to the object and is shown in Fig. 6.17.<br />

A graph for Fig. 6.17 was calculated under the assumption that the optical system<br />

provides a sharp image at all distances and that the image is no larger that the sensing<br />

element area. In practice, this is not always true, especially at shorter distances,<br />

where the image is not only out <strong>of</strong> focus but also may overlap the out-<strong>of</strong>-phase parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> a symmetrical sensor. The reduction in the signal amplitude at shorter distances<br />

becomes apparent: The voltage does not go as high as in the calculated curve.<br />

References<br />

1. Blumenkrantz, S. Personal and Organizational Security Handbook. Government<br />

Data Publications, Washington, DC, 1989.<br />

2. Ryser, P. and Pfister, G. Optical fire and security technology: Sensor principles<br />

and detection intelligence. In: Transducers’91. International conference on Solid-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!