03.01.2015 Views

handbook of modern sensors

handbook of modern sensors

handbook of modern sensors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

508 17 Chemical Sensors<br />

The equivalent conductance <strong>of</strong> the solution at any concentration, C in mol/L or any<br />

convenient units, is given by<br />

= 0 − βC 0.5 , (17.5)<br />

where β is a characteristic <strong>of</strong> the electrolyte and 0 is the equivalent conductance <strong>of</strong><br />

the electrolyte at an infinite dilution.<br />

Measurement techniques <strong>of</strong> electrolytic conductance by an electrochemical conductivity<br />

sensor has remained basically the same over the years. Usually, a Wheatstone<br />

bridge (similar to Fig. 17.4) is used with the electrochemical cell (the sensor) forming<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the resistance arms <strong>of</strong> the bridge. However, unlike the measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

the conductivity <strong>of</strong> a solid, the conductivity measurement <strong>of</strong> an electrolyte is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

complicated by the polarization <strong>of</strong> the electrodes at the operating voltage. A faradic<br />

or charge-transfer process occurs at the electrode surfaces. Therefore, a conductivity<br />

sensor should be operated at a voltage where no faradic process could occur. Another<br />

important consideration is the formation <strong>of</strong> a double layer adjacent to each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

electrodes when a potential is imposed on the cell. This is described by the so-called<br />

Warburg impedance. Hence, even in the absence <strong>of</strong> the faradic process, it is essential<br />

to take into consideration the effect <strong>of</strong> the double layers during measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

the conductance. The effect <strong>of</strong> the faradic process can be minimized by maintaining<br />

the high cell constant L/A <strong>of</strong> the sensor so that the cell resistance lies in the region<br />

between 1 and 50 k. This implies using a small electrode surface area and large interelectrode<br />

distance. This, however, reduces the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the Wheatstone bridge.<br />

Often the solution is in the use <strong>of</strong> a multiple-electrode configuration. Both effects <strong>of</strong><br />

the double layers and the faradic process can be minimized by using a high-frequency<br />

low-amplitude alternating current. Another good technique would be to balance both<br />

the capacitance and the resistance <strong>of</strong> the cell by connecting a variable capacitor in<br />

parallel to the resistance <strong>of</strong> the bridge area adjacent to the cell.<br />

17.4.6 Amperometric Sensors<br />

An example <strong>of</strong> an amperometric chemical sensor is a Clark oxygen sensor which was<br />

proposed in 1956 [10,11]. The operating principle <strong>of</strong> the electrode is based on the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> an electrolyte solution contained within the electrode assembly to transport<br />

oxygen from an oxygen-permeable membrane to the metal cathode. The cathode<br />

current arises from a two-step, oxygen-reduction process that may be represented as<br />

O 2 + 2H 2 O + 2e − → H 2 O 2 + 2OH −<br />

H 2 O 2 + 2e − → 2OH − .<br />

(17.6)<br />

Figure 17.7A shows the membrane which is stretched across the electrode tip, allowing<br />

oxygen to diffuse through a thin electrolyte layer to the cathode. Both anode and<br />

cathode are contained within the sensor assembly, and no electrical contact is made<br />

with the outside sample. A first-order diffusion model <strong>of</strong> the Clark electrode is illustrated<br />

in Fig. 17.7B [11]. The membrane–electrolyte–electrode system is considered

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!