09.01.2015 Views

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A proportion of transfers to ED will involve high acuity patients who have presented with<br />

conditions that are out of scope for the UCC. It is therefore important that UCC staff possess<br />

the training, equipment and facilities required to stabilise patients in the event that their<br />

condition deteriorates before transfer can take place (e.g. resuscitation training and<br />

equipment).<br />

Specialist input<br />

Where a patient is not moved, but expertise is given by another organisation (e.g. expert<br />

wound management by an ED consultant or a radiology report) it is important that there is<br />

clarity as to who retains overall responsibility for the patient. The GMC guidance „Good<br />

Medical Practice‟ on working with colleagues is relevant here.<br />

The provider is responsible for working with Trust colleagues to put in place arrangements<br />

for remote specialist input. This may require a contractual arrangement in the event that<br />

specialist advice is provided by a separate organisation.<br />

Working across organisational interfaces<br />

It is recommended that all policies, processes and procedures relating to organisational<br />

interfaces are developed jointly between the UCC provider and the relevant hospital Trust<br />

prior to implementation. These interfaces should be kept under review and regularly<br />

discussed at Joint Clinical Governance Group meetings.<br />

However, on their own, formal governance structures are not sufficient to deliver a genuinely<br />

integrated service model. Evidence suggests that strong informal working relationships<br />

between ED and UCC managers and clinicians are a necessary pre-condition for effective<br />

joint working 6 . This is especially true where UCC and ED services are operated by different<br />

provider organisations.<br />

Feedback from providers indicates that most barriers to inter-organisational working are not<br />

structural, and could be resolved more effectively via the fostering of strong, day-to-day<br />

relationships between provider organisations. In many instances, potential issues can be<br />

pro-actively identified and addressed without the need to resort to formal escalation.<br />

Patient Involvement<br />

The UCC provider will make arrangements to carry out regular patient experience surveys in<br />

relation to the service and will co-operate with such surveys, including surveys of the ED that<br />

may be carried out by the Commissioner or hospital Trust. In discharging its obligations<br />

under this clause the provider shall have regard to any Department of Health guidance<br />

relating to patient experience.<br />

The UCC provider will be expected to demonstrate evidence of having used patients‟<br />

experience of using the service to make improvements to service delivery. CCGs and UCC<br />

providers should consider collaborating to develop a standard Patient Experience<br />

questionnaire to allow service comparability across NW London.<br />

Accountability<br />

The UCC provider will be accountable to the appropriate local Clinical Commissioning Group<br />

as commissioners of the service.<br />

6 Primary Care and Emergency Department Primary Care Foundation 2010<br />

7b. Work of the Emergency and Urgent Care CIG 166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!