09.01.2015 Views

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 9.25: Potential activity flows for options based on Private Car travel time to next nearest<br />

hospital 17<br />

The pattern for Figure 9.25 is very similar to Figure 9.24. The numbers show the relationship<br />

between:<br />

Ealing and West Middlesex:<br />

o With between 57%-59% of activity transferring between the two sites<br />

(respectively), should one of them not be a major hospital.<br />

Hammersmith and St Mary’s:<br />

o Where between 74%-77% of activity would move between the two sites<br />

(respectively) should one of them not provide services<br />

Chelsea & Westminster and Charing Cross:<br />

o Where between 55%-59% of activity would move between the two sites<br />

(respectively) should one of them not provide services the travel impact of<br />

this change on local populations is small.<br />

This analysis based on public transport travel times can be found in Figure 9.26.<br />

17 TfL HSTAT travel times data.<br />

5. Blue Light travel times estimated as 67% Off-peak Private Car travel times.<br />

6. Current configuration includes Central Middlesex and Hammersmith to understand flow to / from<br />

those sites<br />

7. Hospitals outside of NWL included in analysis = Barnet, Guy‟s, Kingston, Royal Free, St George‟s,<br />

St Thomas‟, St Peter‟s, UCLH, Watford, Wexham Park and Wycombe<br />

8. Travel times from population areas outside of London where >20% patients use NWL hospitals are<br />

included<br />

9b. Decision making analysis stage 5 317

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!