09.01.2015 Views

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“The Brent Health Partnerships Overview and Scrutiny Committee believes a strong clinical<br />

case for change has been made by NHS North West London and that health services need<br />

to be reconfigured to secure better outcomes for patients. This will mean that difficult<br />

decisions will need to be taken, but to “do nothing” is not an option and it is in everyone’s<br />

interests to ensure that services in London have a sustainable <strong>future</strong>.”<br />

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health<br />

“We strongly support the case for change set out in the consultation document.”<br />

Royal College of Surgeons<br />

“Because of the importance of these standards [Commissioning Standards, published in<br />

2012 by London Healthcare Programmes] for emergency surgical care, the College of<br />

Surgeons has been represented on the North West London reconfiguration Board to ensure<br />

that the principals of best practice in emergency surgical care will be strengthened and<br />

improved by the chosen or preferred options for change…..At the present time, it is clear that<br />

the surgical standards cannot be met with any consistency across North West London.”<br />

Ealing Council<br />

“The Council recognises that NHS North-West London have attempted to make a strong<br />

case for the need for change, and that difficult decisions have to be made. It accepts that “do<br />

nothing” is not an option and it is in everyone’s interests to ensure that there is a sustainable<br />

and effective health economy in North West London.”<br />

Feedback received also suggested alternatives to the case for change:<br />

Labour Group at Kensington and Chelsea Council<br />

“The present proposals are driven mainly by financial imperatives rather than a<br />

comprehensive review of what needs to happen to improve health in North West London.”<br />

Independent reports conducted by Tim Rideout Limited on behalf of the London<br />

Borough of Ealing and Hammersmith & Fulham Council<br />

“Trusts are successfully meeting the current quality and financial challenges without the<br />

need for radical reconfiguration.<br />

Indeed, there are other options open to the NHS organisations in NW London. Locally, the<br />

potential merger of Ealing Hospitals NHS Trust and North West London Hospitals NHS Trust<br />

merger should be addressed first before reconfiguration. In addition there are other means of<br />

achieving financial sustainability not addressed within the business case, including:<br />

Renegotiation of Public Finance Initiative (PFI) contracts:<br />

Patient pathway reconfiguration<br />

Commissioner/provider agreement to modify Payment by Results (PbR)”<br />

9.3.4 The implications of this feedback on the Case for Change<br />

The feedback we received about the Case for Change did include suggestions for<br />

alternatives. We considered these alternatives to reconfiguration as follows:<br />

Response to feedback about renegotiation of Public Finance Initiative (PFI)<br />

contracts in the Rideout report: West Middlesex and NW London Hospitals have<br />

confirmed that they intend to review PFI contracts and achieve the lowest possible<br />

cost, but this work has no bearing on the SAHF appraisal of the options because it<br />

9a. Decision making analysis stages 1 to 4 275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!