09.01.2015 Views

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the service models. Options for the configuration of major hospitals were assessed using<br />

hurdle criteria to determine that five were needed and to produce a list of eight configuration<br />

options. These eight options were evaluated using criteria (covering quality of care, access<br />

to care, value for money, deliverability and research & education) developed before and after<br />

consultation. This evaluation enabled us to determine a preferred option. We confirmed that<br />

this remained the best option if our modelling assumptions changed through the sensitivity<br />

analysis.<br />

10. The proposed <strong>future</strong> configuration of hospitals in NW London<br />

This chapter summarises the results of the decision making analysis and sets out the<br />

programme’s proposed <strong>future</strong> configuration of hospitals in NW London. This is based on<br />

Option A in the consultation and has been refined following feedback from the consultation<br />

and the analysis in response to this feedback. The recommendation is for a local hospital<br />

(including an Urgent Care Centre operating 24 hours a day, 7 days a week) and major<br />

hospital (24/7 A&E with co-located obstetrics and maternity unit and inpatient paediatrics) on<br />

the Chelsea and Westminster, Hillingdon, Northwick Park, St Mary’s and West Middlesex<br />

sites, a local and elective hospital at Central Middlesex, a local hospital at Charing Cross<br />

and Ealing and a local and specialist hospital with an obstetric-led maternity unit at<br />

Hammersmith.<br />

11. Assuring the proposals<br />

This chapter shows that there has been ongoing assurance and scrutiny to verify that<br />

proposals are sound and well communicated to and considered by all stakeholders<br />

throughout the programme. During the pre-consultation phase the programme was assured<br />

by an Office of Government Commerce Gateway review. The clinical proposals were<br />

assured by the National Clinical Advisory Team (NCAT), external clinical reviews and<br />

through our own review of the relevant clinical evidence. NHS London confirmed that the<br />

programme met the Four Tests for reconfiguration set out by the Secretary of State. During<br />

and following the consultation, the programme has continued to work to meet the Four Tests<br />

and sought further assurance from NCAT and external clinical reviews. This includes a<br />

detailed literature review of recent clinical evidence and a review of clinically relevant<br />

feedback from the consultation.<br />

12. Travel and access implications<br />

This chapter describes the expected travel and access impacts of the recommendation, by<br />

borough and site, for all modes of transport, including emergency travel times and maximum<br />

journey times to the proposed major hospital sites. This chapter also considers the impact of<br />

public transport options. The programme established a Travel Advisory Group bringing<br />

together representatives from local authorities, Transport for London, London Ambulance<br />

Service and public and patient representatives. 91% of activity will be unaffected by the<br />

proposals. Changes to travel times will be greatest in Ealing, Brent and Hammersmith and<br />

Fulham. Evidence shows that travelling to the right location for the right care has a greater<br />

impact on outcomes than distance travelled.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!