09.01.2015 Views

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The changes to the scoring before and after consultation have primarily decreased because<br />

of the refreshed value for money analysis for the three consultation options. Additional<br />

analysis undertaken on research and education in response to feedback received during<br />

consultation supports the higher relative ranking of options that designate Chelsea and<br />

Westminster as a major hospital over those that designate Charing Cross as a major<br />

hospital, and strengthens the data collated to support designation of reconfiguration option<br />

A. Note that although the score for the other options has not decreased, this may be due to<br />

the value for money analysis not being refreshed for these options. The sensitivity analysis<br />

confirmed that Option A (Option 5 in the table above) remains the strongest.<br />

As a result of the decision-making analysis, the Clinical Board agreed that Option A (Option<br />

5 in the table above) should be the recommendation. The Finance & Business Planning<br />

Working Group agreed that Option A was better than the other options. The Programme<br />

Board reviewed the completed evaluation and analysis and considered the<br />

recommendations of the Clinical Board and the Finance & Business Planning Working<br />

Group. The Board noted the two recommendations and agreed with the assessment that<br />

Option A should be the recommended configuration.<br />

10.2. The recommended configuration<br />

Based on the pre-consultation options evaluation, Option A was our preferred option at the<br />

start of the consultation. During consultation we received feedback about the process of<br />

reaching this preferred option and about the evaluation itself. Post-consultation, we have<br />

responded to the feedback and refreshed the options evaluation. Option A remains our<br />

recommended option for configuration.<br />

The evaluation and post-consultation analysis did not change the high level configuration in<br />

the preferred option. However, it did enable us to consider additional services that could be<br />

located as part of local hospital sites and this meant some lower-level changes to the<br />

configuration of the Charing Cross site.<br />

The recommended configuration proposes the following service models at each site. At:<br />

Chelsea & Westminster – a local hospital and a major hospital<br />

Hillingdon – a local hospital and a major hospital<br />

Northwick Park – a local hospital and a major hospital<br />

St Mary’s – a local hospital, a major hospital, a Hyper Acute Stroke Unit (moved<br />

from Charing Cross Hospital) and a specialist ophthalmology hospital (moving the<br />

Western Eye Hospital onto the site)<br />

West Middlesex – a local hospital and a major hospital<br />

Central Middlesex – a local hospital and an elective hospital<br />

Charing Cross – a local hospital<br />

Ealing – a local hospital<br />

Hammersmith – a specialist hospital with obstetric-led maternity unit and a local<br />

hospital<br />

Five specialist hospitals in NW London are not affected by these proposals. These are<br />

Harefield, Mount Vernon, Royal Brompton, Royal Marsden and RNOH.<br />

10. The proposed <strong>future</strong> configuration of hospitals in NW London 421

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!