09.01.2015 Views

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 8.18: Process for assessing GP practices and estimating associated capital<br />

requirements<br />

Survey estates<br />

▪ Drivers Jonas Deloitte, estate<br />

specialists, booked to survey<br />

~160 participating practices<br />

across 7 CCGs, of which<br />

~120 practices are already<br />

in the database<br />

▪ Premises assigned ratings<br />

for condition and disabled<br />

access compliance (DDA)<br />

▪ Costs to upgrade to<br />

acceptable condition/DDA<br />

estimated for each practice<br />

Classify surveyed<br />

estate based on<br />

condition<br />

▪ For properties rated B or<br />

below (but that can be<br />

upgraded), estimated total<br />

cost to upgrade to acceptable<br />

condition / DDA compliance<br />

▪ For properties that we cannot<br />

upgrade due to structural<br />

restrictions (DX), estimated<br />

total cost to rebuild premises<br />

▪ Estimate total costs for<br />

addressing GP premises in<br />

database by combining costs<br />

for upgrading properties and<br />

for rebuilding DX estates<br />

Scale up estimate to<br />

total CCG<br />

▪ Using list sizes, extrapolate<br />

estimated cost to improve<br />

premises of participating<br />

practices to produce an<br />

estimate of total cost to<br />

address all GP premises<br />

across the 7 CCGs that were<br />

surveyed<br />

▪ Estimate for Brent by<br />

referencing Ealing figures<br />

The aim of this work was to understand how primary care estates in NW London can be<br />

used to deliver out of hospital services and how investment in the estate can be best<br />

prioritised to improve quality and capacity. The findings of this survey are summarised in<br />

Figure 8.19.<br />

Figure 8.19: Condition of GP practices in NW London<br />

Sample summary<br />

Surveyed premises<br />

Extrapolated premises<br />

Total<br />

Number of<br />

premises<br />

Number of<br />

premises<br />

surveyed<br />

% of list<br />

served by<br />

premises<br />

surveyed<br />

Rated<br />

condition<br />

B or<br />

above<br />

Rated<br />

below condition<br />

B<br />

(not Dx) 1<br />

Rated DX<br />

on DDA<br />

compliance<br />

Rated<br />

condition<br />

B or<br />

above<br />

Rated<br />

below condition<br />

B<br />

(not Dx) 1<br />

Rated DX<br />

on DDA<br />

compliance<br />

Harrow<br />

35 20 44% 5 5 10 9 9 17<br />

Hillingdon<br />

48 25 51% 7 9 9 13 18 17<br />

Brent 2<br />

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Ealing<br />

82 44 64% 18 11 15 33 21 28<br />

Hounslow<br />

55 22 38% 12 9 1 29 23 3<br />

Hammersmith<br />

and Fulham<br />

32 11 43% 8 1 2 23 3 6<br />

West London<br />

55 13 31% 2 5 6 8 22 25<br />

Central London<br />

36 12 38% 6 3 3 18 9 9<br />

1 Not DX on DDA compliance<br />

2 Brent CCG conducted a similar survey of GP premises in 2012, but comparable results are not available<br />

The investment identified by this review is of two types. Many practices can be upgraded to<br />

meet condition and accessibility standards with relatively low capital investment in existing<br />

buildings. However, a number of practices have significant constraints, which mean they<br />

8c. Out of hospital estates 248

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!