SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

Figure 9.58: Evaluation of co-dependencies with other initiatives
This evaluation was agreed by the Clinical Board and the Programme Board during the preconsultation
phase.
9.9.41 Feedback received about the sub-criterion co-dependencies with other
strategies during consultation
During consultation we received the following feedback about the co-dependencies with
other strategies sub-criterion:
Independent reports conducted by Tim Rideout Limited on behalf of the London
Borough of Ealing
“Finally, in terms of deliverability, the assessment includes a consideration of codependencies
with other strategies, to take account of other work and initiatives going on
within NW London and beyond…The business case‟s assessment gave Options 5 and 6 the
highest rating. Options that contain Ealing over West Middlesex are scored slightly worse
due to the Stroke Unit at West Middlesex and the fact that Ealing is the only site without a
stroke unit.”
9.9.42 The implications of this feedback for the co-dependencies with other strategies
sub-criterion
We have considered feedback received about the sub-criterions. Given the feedback, the
absence of any alternative, clinicians concluded that no response was required.
9.9.43 The outcome of the co-dependencies with other strategies sub-criterion
Clinicians agreed the pre-consultation evaluation was still valid. We confirmed this
evaluation with the Clinical Board and Programme Board during the post consultation phase.
This outcome is unchanged from pre-consultation.
9c Decision making analysis stage 6 370