09.01.2015 Views

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.9.36 Feedback received about sub-criterion expected time to deliver during<br />

consultation<br />

During consultation we received the following feedback related to the expected time to<br />

deliver sub-criterion:<br />

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust<br />

“These changes will take time to deliver so the pace of change required by <strong>SaHF</strong> is an<br />

important consideration. Given the scale of change required across eight clinical<br />

commissioning groups, we are concerned that the implementation date of March 2016 may<br />

be too optimistic.”<br />

Ealing Hospital NHS Trust<br />

“The scale of change envisaged in <strong>SaHF</strong> in the timeframe suggested is very ambitious and<br />

the Board hoped this would be reviewed prior to any reconfiguration.”<br />

Brent North Constituency Labour Party<br />

“2 to 3 years for delivery of enhanced community health services is overly optimistic.”<br />

Roadshow event, ‘universal themes’, Ipsos MORI report<br />

“…Concerns about the timescales for change…”<br />

Hospital site event, ‘key concerns’, Ipsos MORI report<br />

“…Timescales…”<br />

User Panel, NHS Central London Clinical Commissioning Group<br />

“We think that the timescales are not long enough to enable sufficient investment to go into<br />

community services to ensure that these services work well, are able to meet the demand,<br />

and are able to reduce demand on A&E services.”<br />

North West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee<br />

“There are concerns over the readiness and capacity of out of hospital services, the realism<br />

of timescales for change and the likelihood of cost transfer from the NHS to others.”<br />

Independent reports conducted by Tim Rideout Limited on behalf of the London<br />

Borough of Ealing and Hammersmith & Fulham Council<br />

“The deliverability criteria also include an assessment of the expected time to deliver each<br />

option. This assessment should be challenged. It includes again (double counting)<br />

information from the financial base case based on the premise that “it is very difficult for<br />

Trusts facing such financial difficulties to make the changes in services as part of the<br />

reconfiguration”. No evidence is provided in support of this statement and it doesn‟t take<br />

account of other proposed actions, most notably including the merger between Ealing<br />

Hospital NHS Trust and North West London Hospitals NHS Trust. The assessment also<br />

uses again the assessment of new capacity required (a double count). Finally, it incorporates<br />

an assessment of the movement of adult and maternity beds. Currently, in overall terms this<br />

assessment of expected time to deliver ranks options 5 and 6 as equal highest.”<br />

9.9.37 The implications of this feedback for the expected time to deliver sub-criterion<br />

We have considered the feedback received during consultation as follows:<br />

9c Decision making analysis stage 6 366

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!