09.01.2015 Views

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Support for the proposal is higher among women (77%) than men (72%), and higher among<br />

those from BME groups (82%) compared with those from white backgrounds (73%). Those<br />

aged 25-34 are more likely to support the proposal than overall (81% vs 75%). There is no<br />

significant difference in support between respondents with a disability and those without a<br />

disability.<br />

There is no significant difference in overall support between current/past workers of the NHS<br />

or independent health sector and those who have never worked in the health sector.<br />

Across the eight North West London boroughs, support is significantly higher among those<br />

living in Kensington and Chelsea than overall (85%). Higher levels of support are also seen<br />

among those living in Richmond (87%) and Wandsworth (92%).<br />

Support for the proposal is also significantly higher than overall among those most likely to<br />

receive urgent care at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (83%) and West Middlesex<br />

Hospital (81%).<br />

7.35 Paediatric and maternity units in major hospital<br />

Very few stakeholders commented on the specific proposal that all major hospitals should<br />

have inpatient paediatric units. Those that did, including the Royal College of Paediatrics<br />

and Child Health, supported it.<br />

The proposal for all major hospitals to have consultant-led maternity units, together with a<br />

unit at Queen Charlotte‟s and Chelsea Hospital if Hammersmith Hospital is not a major<br />

hospital, was also supported by most of the relatively small numbers of stakeholders<br />

commenting on it.<br />

The Royal College of Midwives supported the proposals but criticised the absence of<br />

any freestanding midwife-led units in the proposals or discussions on how to<br />

facilitate home births:<br />

“The loss of consultant obstetric services at Ealing could have a negative impact on tackling<br />

health inequalities in the borough; this could be mitigated – at least for women at low<br />

medical risk - if the obstetric service were replaced by a FMU…. we are extremely<br />

disappointed that <strong>Shaping</strong> a <strong>healthier</strong> <strong>future</strong> does not include any proposals for the<br />

establishment of freestanding midwife-led units (FMUs).”<br />

This proposal also attracted some concerns and criticisms. Ealing Hospital Medical Staff<br />

Committee questioned where the „extra births‟ were going to go to and how maternity<br />

services are going to cope. Ealing Council raised “the clear risk of loss of valued and high<br />

quality maternity services should <strong>SaHF</strong> proposals be taken forward.”<br />

Hillingdon LINk argued that the targets to increase the number of home births are highly<br />

ambitious and questioned whether “large maternity units” meet the needs of expectant<br />

mothers.<br />

7.36 Specific Feedback<br />

During Consultation a number of specific organisational responses were received. These<br />

were individually considered by the CIG. Details of these and other responses are below.<br />

7d. Work of the Maternity CIG 197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!