SaHF DMBC Volume 1 Edition 1.1.pdf - Shaping a healthier future

Figure 9.60: Evaluation of disruption to Research and Education 14
Chelsea & Westminster already carries out research and could do more because they have
the capacity to do so (although this scenario isn‟t unique to Chelsea & Westminster), but the
amount of research work is much smaller compared to the research undertaken at
Hammersmith and St Mary‟s. It therefore has a negligible effect in being able to differentiate
between options.
This evaluation was agreed pre-consultation by clinicians. This recommendation was
approved by the Clinical Board and the Programme Board.
9.9.46 Feedback received about the disruption sub-criterion during consultation
During consultation we received the following feedback about the disruption sub-criterion:
Independent report conducted by Tim Rideout Limited on behalf of the London
Borough of Ealing
“The last element of the option appraisal was an assessment of the impact on research and
education. In terms of potential disruption, no differentiation was made between the options
beyond seeking to protect the position at Hammersmith and St Mary‟s (as they scored
particularly well in the 2011 National Training Survey). The ultimate conclusion of this
element is that it is critical for research to be collocated with clinical delivery and therefore
Options 5 to 8 were ranked the highest.”
Imperial AHSC
“Currently Charing Cross (CXH) is the major centre for undergraduate medical education,
housing two major lecture theatres (> 300 students) not available elsewhere, major teaching
14 Notes for Figure 9.60:
1. ICHT site split provided by the Trust. Research split as 20% Charing Cross; 60% Hammersmith and 20% St
Mary‟s; Education split as 38% Charing Cross; 23% Hammersmith and 39% St Mary‟s
2. Where Hammersmith is not an Major hospital site, it is assumed to retain all Research and Education as an
Specialist centre (Specialist) site
9c Decision making analysis stage 6 373