06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92 <strong>Educability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Differences</strong><br />

gain component of the achievement test score would be a smaller<br />

proportion of total [consolidated] achievement for the brighter<br />

sibs <strong>and</strong> thus would not so attenuate the correlation between them.<br />

In other words, their phenotypic correlation would be closer to<br />

their genetic correlation.) This result is in fact what has been<br />

found. Burt (1943) divided sibling pairs into two groups: those<br />

above the median in IQ (i.e., 100 IQ) <strong>and</strong> those below the median.<br />

The correlation between siblings’ scholastic achievement test<br />

scores was 0-61 for the above-average sibs <strong>and</strong> only 0-47 for the<br />

below-average sibs.<br />

Another inference from our model is that sibling correlations<br />

(based on tests given at the same age for both sibs) in measures<br />

of intelligence should be substantial <strong>and</strong> should increase with age,<br />

while year-to-year measures of gain should show much lower or<br />

even negligible correlations. The status measures, which increasingly<br />

reflect C, therefore, would also increasingly reflect the genetic<br />

factors which the sibs have in common, while the gains, which<br />

reflect motivation <strong>and</strong> specific learning <strong>and</strong> largely fortuitous<br />

environmental factors, should show little, if any, sib correlation.<br />

This inference, too, has been substantiated in part in a longitudinal<br />

study conducted at the Fels Research Institute (McCall, 1970).<br />

The level (status) of intelligence at any given age was found to<br />

show much higher heritability than the pattern of changes (gains)<br />

in intelligence from one time to another (an average interval of<br />

9 months). Although there is an increase in sib correlations with<br />

age, it is not statistically significant. The model also predicts that<br />

parent-child correlations should be higher when they are based<br />

on measures of the parent as an adult than measures of the parent<br />

taken at the same age as those on the child. McCall’s (1970) study,<br />

which also included parent-child correlations of test scores<br />

obtained when both parent <strong>and</strong> child were between 3 <strong>and</strong> 12 years<br />

of age, showed significantly lowrer parent-child correlations than<br />

have been found in studies of parent-child correlations in which<br />

the parent was measured as an adult. (The one exception reported in<br />

the literature is Burt’s [1966, Table 4] parent-child IQ correlation of<br />

0-49 when the parents were adults <strong>and</strong> of 0-56 when the parents’<br />

childhood IQs were used.) McCall (1970, p. 647) concludes:<br />

.. . although the general level of IQ appears to show heritability,<br />

the pattern of IQ change over age possesses far less heritability

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!