06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Race <strong>Differences</strong> in Intelligence 161<br />

had annual earnings only three-quarters as high as those of white<br />

men with the stated average characteristics of the Negro men.<br />

TWIN DIFFERENCES AND RACE DIFFERENCES<br />

Social scientists who are most critical <strong>and</strong> disapproving of any<br />

suggestion of the possibility that genetic factors are implicated in<br />

racial differences in intelligence apparently believe there is an<br />

important argument in their favor to be gleaned from comparisons<br />

of identical twin differences <strong>and</strong> race differences in IQ. For<br />

example, in a widely published statement <strong>by</strong> the Council of the<br />

Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (1969)1 we<br />

read: ‘In an examination of <strong>Jensen</strong>’s [1969a] data, we find that<br />

observed racial differences in intelligence can be attributed to<br />

environmental factors. Thus, identical twins reared in different<br />

environments can show differences in intelligence test scores which<br />

are fully comparable to the differences found between racial<br />

groups.’ This argument has been emphasized <strong>and</strong> elaborated upon<br />

<strong>by</strong> a number of psychologists (e.g., Gottesman, 1968, p. 28;<br />

Deutsch, 1969, p. 549; Kagan, 1969, p. 275; Burgess & Jahoda,<br />

1970). Because twin differences in IQ have thus been held up as<br />

one of the major arguments against the hypothesis of genetic<br />

differences between racial groups, we must carry this analysis<br />

through to its logical conclusion.<br />

Two major criticisms may be made of the argument as it has<br />

been presented <strong>by</strong> its proponents (viz., all of those cited above).<br />

First, they pick <strong>and</strong> choose among the twin differences that they<br />

wish to consider. In not one of the comparisons has the total<br />

available evidence been examined. Instead, selected cases of the<br />

most extreme twin differences on record are compared with the<br />

average Negro-white difference in IQ. Second, it is never noted<br />

that measurement error constitutes part of the average twin difference<br />

but does not enter into the mean difference between population<br />

groups. Therefore comparisons are always made between twin<br />

differences including measurement error <strong>and</strong> group differences free<br />

of measurement error.2 Let us remedy these two faults <strong>and</strong> see<br />

what conclusions can validly follow from a comparison of twin<br />

differences with race differences.<br />

Only monozygotic (MZ) twins are of interest to us here, since<br />

they have identical genotypes <strong>and</strong> any difference between them

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!