06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

296 <strong>Educability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Differences</strong><br />

either group has in common with, say, the Eskimos or the Australian<br />

Bushmen. Whatever experiential differences exist are largely<br />

social status differences rather than cultural differences in any<br />

meaningful sense of the word.<br />

To say that an intelligence test is culturally-biased or statusbiased<br />

means that the knowledge, skills, <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s of the test<br />

sample the specific learning opportunities of one subpopulation<br />

(i.e., social class or racial group) more than of another. One can<br />

think of many examples of questions that would be easier for<br />

children of one subpopulation than of another. The question, for<br />

example, ‘What are chopsticks made of’ would favor Oriental<br />

children; ‘What are tortillas’ would favor Mexican children;<br />

‘What are chitterlings’ would favor Negro children; ‘What is<br />

the Talmud’ wrould favor Jewish children, <strong>and</strong> so on. One could<br />

presumably devise a test composed entirely of specially selected<br />

items that would give a marked advantage to any particular subpopulation<br />

one might choose. The culture-bias hypothesis claims<br />

that this in fact is what has been done: intentionally or unintentionally,<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard intelligence tests have been composed of items<br />

which favor middle- <strong>and</strong> upper-class whites <strong>and</strong> disfavor all other<br />

groups, especially Negroes, other minorities, <strong>and</strong> lowTer-class<br />

whites. How valid is this claim Since I have discussed these<br />

issues at length elsewhere (<strong>Jensen</strong>, 1968c, 1970b), I will here<br />

attempt only a brief summary of the main points.<br />

Surely one can point to ‘culture-loaded’ items on many st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

intelligence tests. Questions about exotic zoo animals, fairy tales,<br />

<strong>and</strong> musical instruments are obvious examples of items that should<br />

favor children from well-to-do homes <strong>and</strong> disfavor children from<br />

poor homes which afford little opportunity to learn about such<br />

things. In one obvious attempt to discredit IQ tests, five highly<br />

‘culture-loaded’ items from the Comprehension subtest of the<br />

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) were selected for<br />

display <strong>by</strong> proponents of the culture-bias hypothesis of Negrowhite<br />

IQ difference (Bulletin of the Cambridge Society for Social<br />

Responsibility in Science, 18 July 1970, p. 6). It may therefore<br />

seem ironic to discover that, in fact, among the eleven subtests<br />

of the WAIS, the one on which Negroes actually differ least from<br />

whites is the very Comprehension test that was held up as an<br />

example of test items that might seem to be culturally biased<br />

against Negroes (e.g., ‘Why should people pay taxes’ ‘Why does

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!