06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technical Misconceptions <strong>and</strong> Obfuscations 45<br />

demonstrate) a perfect relationship between characteristics or<br />

measurements of the environment <strong>and</strong> the effects of these environmental<br />

differences upon the phenotype can we directly equate<br />

7 1 with the variance of some independent measurement of environments.<br />

The model as presented here may assume or imply a one-toone<br />

correspondence between the objective environment <strong>and</strong> the<br />

e ffects of the environment on the phenotype.<br />

Heritability, then, is defined as the proportion of total phenotypic<br />

variance (individual differences) shown <strong>by</strong> a trait that can be<br />

attributed to genetic variation in the population:<br />

(7 2 0-2<br />

h2 = = i f (2.4)<br />

al + a2 a2<br />

What are the limitations of this h2} First of all, since we usually<br />

cannot measure a trait in every member of the population, we have<br />

to be content with a sample from the population which provides<br />

us with an estimate of h2. From the sample we get an approximation<br />

of the value of h2 in the entire population, <strong>and</strong> the larger the<br />

sample, the better is the approximation. Conversely, the larger<br />

the sample, the smaller is the margin of error in our estimate. So<br />

we must be aware that estimates of h2 all involve sampling error,<br />

more or less, depending upon the adequacy of the sample.<br />

Secondly, since populations can change over time, the obtained<br />

estimate of h2 pertains only to the population that was actually<br />

sampled. How much h2 varies from time to time or from one<br />

population to another can only be answered empirically. It has<br />

often been noted, however, that much of the interest <strong>and</strong> value in<br />

heritability estimates derives from the fact that h2 for a given<br />

characteristic is not a highly unstable statistic but under natural<br />

conditions generally remains very much in the same range across<br />

time <strong>and</strong> across a variety of populations. This, of course, means no<br />

more than the fact that the populations <strong>and</strong> conditions under which<br />

heritability estimates are generally made do not differ all that much.<br />

It is entirely possible, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, to find marked exceptions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> it is also possible experimentally to produce great changes in<br />

h2 <strong>by</strong> radically increasing or decreasing the variation in environmental<br />

factors, or <strong>by</strong> increasing or decreasing the genetic variance<br />

through selective breeding. Since h2 reflects a ratio of genetic<br />

to phenotypic variance, a change in either source of variance will<br />

alter the value of h2. It is possible to go wrong <strong>by</strong> believing that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!