06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Accentuated Environmental Inequalities 253<br />

note that Orientals, who in Coleman’s study scored higher than<br />

any other groups in non-verbal <strong>and</strong> mathematical abilities, have<br />

the highest index figures in accounting, architecture, engineering,<br />

<strong>and</strong> natural sciences. Negroes, who were lowest in non-verbal<br />

abilities <strong>and</strong> relatively higher in verbal, show the lowest indices<br />

for professions involving spatial <strong>and</strong> quantitative abilities, such as<br />

architecture <strong>and</strong> engineering, <strong>and</strong> are most heavily represented<br />

in such verbal professions as school teaching <strong>and</strong> the clergy.<br />

If prejudice <strong>and</strong> discrimination are more important than abilities<br />

in determining a group’s representation among the professional<br />

classes, then it should be puzzling that two minorities - the<br />

Japanese <strong>and</strong> Chinese - who have also been subject to discrimination<br />

<strong>and</strong> other social disadvantages in the United States should<br />

have considerably higher indices than the white majority. The<br />

group labeled white in Table 12.2 includes Jews, whose separate<br />

overall average is an index of 282, which is <strong>by</strong> far the highest, <strong>and</strong><br />

nearly triple the index for non-Jewish whites, although Jews have<br />

experienced prejudice <strong>and</strong> social discrimination. The figures of<br />

Table 12.2 lend support to the popular characterization of Jews<br />

<strong>and</strong> Orientals as America’s intellectual elite. The reasons, undoubtedly<br />

complex, probably involve selective migration, selective<br />

<strong>and</strong> assortative mating patterns, differential job opportunities <strong>and</strong><br />

other associated genetic <strong>and</strong> cultural factors.<br />

NOTES<br />

1. The environmental variables were: (1) reading material in home,<br />

(2) items in home (cultural amenities), (3) structural integrity of<br />

home, (4) foreign language in home, (5) preschool attendance, (6)<br />

encyclopedia in home, (7) parents’ education, (8) time spent on<br />

homework, (9) parents’ educational desires for child, (10) parents'<br />

interest in school work, (11) child’s self-concept (self-esteem), (12)<br />

child’s interest in school <strong>and</strong> reading.<br />

2. The largest <strong>and</strong> methodologically most thorough study of this<br />

question showed that racial composition of the classroom of itself<br />

had no effect on IQ (Wilson, 1967).<br />

3. If from a normal distribution, with mean = 0, o = 1, a segment of<br />

the distribution lying between two points on the abscissa, z t <strong>and</strong> z2,<br />

is eliminated, the resulting mean (Xs) of the eliminated segment is:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!