06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Language Deprivation 283<br />

forces to encourage semantic development’. However, there is<br />

another possible interpretation of these findings which brings<br />

them theoretically under the purview of a much broader range of<br />

findings in developmental psychology. First, there is a fundamental<br />

biological principle, so general that it holds both across species<br />

<strong>and</strong> within a given species, which states that the more prolonged<br />

the infancy, the greater in general is the cognitive ability of the<br />

species at maturity. Precocity of early motor development, as<br />

assessed <strong>by</strong> infant tests, is negatively correlated with IQ at maturity<br />

among whites; <strong>and</strong> low SES white children, who show higher than<br />

average motor development scores in the first year of life, obtain<br />

below-average IQs as teenagers (Bayley, 1966). At birth <strong>and</strong> during<br />

the first year <strong>and</strong> a half of life, Negro infants, whether born in<br />

Africa or America, are physically <strong>and</strong> motorically more advanced<br />

than white infants; the majority of studies have shown this<br />

(Ainsworth, 1963, 1967; Bayley, 1965; Curti et al., 1935; Durham<br />

Education Improvement Program, 1966-7a, b; Falade, 1955,<br />

1960; Geber, 1956, 1958a, b, 1960, 1962; Geber & Dean, 1957a, b,<br />

1958, 1964, 1966; Gillil<strong>and</strong>, 1951; Kilbride, 1969; Knobloch &<br />

Pasamanick, 1953, 1958; Liddicoat, 1969; Liddicoat & Koza,<br />

1963; Masse, 1969; Moreigne & Senecal, 1962; Naylor &<br />

Myrianthopoulos, 1967; Nelson & Dean, 1959; Pasamanick, 1949;<br />

Ramarosaona, 1959; Scott, Ferguson, Jenkins & Cutler, 1955;<br />

Vouilloux, 1959; Walters, 1967; Williams & Scott, 1953). Only<br />

three studies, in African samples, have reported findings of no<br />

significant differences in infant development (Langton, 1934-5;<br />

Theunissen, 1948; Falmagne, 1959).2 Finally, language development<br />

is a species specific characteristic peculiar but universal to<br />

humans, which is intimately related to other developmental<br />

processes, including motoric behavior. Precocity of language<br />

development, as contrasted with the later role of language as a<br />

vehicle for abstract, conceptual processes, thus may be viewed as<br />

another reflection of generally accelerated sensori-motor development.<br />

The generally negative correlation between rapidity of early<br />

development <strong>and</strong> later level of cognitive ability reflected in intelligence<br />

tests <strong>and</strong> other indices of conceptual ability is consistent<br />

with the later deceleration of linguistically precocious children - a<br />

deceleration that shows up at the age when the child’s language<br />

begins to reflect more complex, abstract, <strong>and</strong> conceptual mental<br />

processes.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!