06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

220 <strong>Educability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Differences</strong><br />

racial differences in the distribution of intelligence. The research<br />

possibilities implicit in this approach, however, are considerable,<br />

but they depend upon genetically quite sophisticated methodologies<br />

which have been recently suggested but have not yet been applied<br />

to the problem. Earlier studies based on highly visible physical<br />

characteristics as criteria for degree of racial hybridization were<br />

virtually doomed to inconclusiveness.<br />

American Negroes are racial hybrids. In 1926 Herskovits found<br />

that 70 percent of a U.S. Negro sample reported having one or<br />

more white ancestors (Herskovits, 1926), <strong>and</strong> in 1969, T. E. Reed,<br />

a leading student of this subject, asserted that there are probably<br />

no Negroes of pure African descent being born in the United<br />

States today, unless they are born to African exchange students<br />

(Reed, 1969a). Reed states that the American Negro usually has<br />

‘between 2 <strong>and</strong> 50 percent of his genes from Caucasian ancestors,<br />

<strong>and</strong> these genes were very probably received after 1700’ (Reed,<br />

1969a, p. 165). All but a negligible proportion of the slaves brought<br />

to the United States arrived between 1700 <strong>and</strong> 1800 <strong>and</strong> totalled<br />

somewhat less than 400,000. Most of the introduction of Caucasian<br />

genes into the American Negro gene pool occurred during the<br />

period of slavery. Today the average percentage of Caucasian<br />

genes in American Negroes is estimated, on the basis of blood<br />

groups, at something between 20 <strong>and</strong> 30 percent. (These estimates<br />

are based largely on population samples from northern urban<br />

areas.) The evidence has been summarized <strong>by</strong> Reed (1969a). The<br />

most representative estimate is probably that of Negroes in Oakl<strong>and</strong>,<br />

California, with 22 percent Caucasian genes. Due mainly to<br />

selective migration, the percentages differ in various parts of the<br />

country, being generally lowest in the ‘Deep South’ <strong>and</strong> highest<br />

in the North <strong>and</strong> the West. The average in two counties in Georgia<br />

is 11 percent. Representative samples in other localities are New<br />

York (19 percent), Detroit (26 percent), Baltimore (22-31 percent).<br />

Chicago (13 percent), Washington <strong>and</strong> Baltimore (20-24 percents.<br />

Charleston, South Carolina (4-8 percent). Within each of these<br />

Negro subpopulations there is considerable variability among<br />

individuals in their percentage of Caucasian genes. The Oakl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

California Negro population, with its mean of 22 percent Caucasian<br />

genes, has an estimated st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of 14 percent (Shockley.<br />

1970b), which means that the variability of the degree of Caucasian<br />

admixture among the California Negroes is at least as great as the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!