06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

350 <strong>Educability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Differences</strong><br />

3. The closest to anything like this that I have been able to find in the<br />

relevant literature on human nutrition <strong>and</strong> growth is a study, carried<br />

out in Aberdeen, Scotl<strong>and</strong>, which showed a correlation between the<br />

mother’s nutritional status as determined <strong>by</strong> her height <strong>and</strong> her<br />

infant’s birth weight <strong>and</strong> subsequent growth <strong>and</strong> development; there<br />

were also correlations between mother’s height, child’s height at age<br />

7, <strong>and</strong> his performance on achievement tests in school (Birch,<br />

Richardson, Baird, Horobin & Illsley, 1970). The possible confounding<br />

of genetic <strong>and</strong> nutritional factors in determining these<br />

relationships rules out any definite interpretation.<br />

4. The investigation also conducted parallel studies in two rural<br />

samples of poor Appalachian whites in Tennessee. Their nutritional<br />

status was higher than that of the urban samples mainly because<br />

they raised much of their own food. About 70 percent of the rural<br />

samples, as compared with about 50 percent of the urban samples,<br />

had pin worms. The IQs of the rural whites averaged about 6 points<br />

lower than those of the urban whites.<br />

5. An assistant director of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s human<br />

nutrition research division claimed that 50 percent of children with<br />

IQs in the range from 70-80 are depressed 10 IQ points due to<br />

poor nutrition (Biomedical News, November 1971, p. 14). Despite<br />

repeated efforts, however, I have not succeeded in obtaining from<br />

the official source of this claim any factual evidence that would<br />

substantiate it.<br />

6. If we assume a mean IQ of 100 in the white population, 85 in the<br />

Negro population, <strong>and</strong> an SD of 15 in each population, <strong>and</strong> further<br />

assume that all brain-damaged persons are of lower IQ than neurologically<br />

non-damaged persons, what percentage of the Negro<br />

population would have to be screened out as neurologically damaged<br />

in order to bear out this prediction <strong>by</strong> Amante et al. Calculations<br />

indicate that at least the lower 62 percent of the Negro population<br />

in IQ would have to be screened out for the remaining 38 percent to<br />

have a mean IQ of 100. This surprising conclusion would seem to<br />

cast some doubt on this hypothesis. Have there been any estimates<br />

of the incidence of neurological damage in the Negro population<br />

which come anywhere near such a figure <strong>and</strong> which are also experimentally<br />

independent of the IQ determination, i.e., based on<br />

criteria that do not include measurement of the dependent variable,<br />

viz., IQ I know of none. The criteria used in the study <strong>by</strong> Amante<br />

et al. were derived from signs of the Bender Gestalt Test, which<br />

itself has a high g loading, making it difficult, if not impossible,<br />

to distinguish reliably between signs of neurological impairment<br />

<strong>and</strong> sheer mental immaturity. Among neurologically normal white<br />

middle-class elementary school children, Bender-Gestalt perfor-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!