06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Language Deprivation 281<br />

language development in Negroes, has argued that the Negro<br />

child is linguistically advanced compared to the middle-class<br />

white child. Entwisle (1970) has carried out a series of studies of<br />

the most basic aspects of language development based largely on<br />

children’s free word associations. Children are asked to give ‘the<br />

first word you think of’ in response to a st<strong>and</strong>ard set of stimulus<br />

words. The words represent different degrees of rarity <strong>and</strong><br />

different grammatical form classes - nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.<br />

The nature of the child’s associations to the stimulus words<br />

follows a regular developmental sequence. It is the type of response<br />

rather than the specific content of the response that is most<br />

important. Younger children, for example, are much more likely<br />

to give a syntactic phrase completion response to a stimulus word<br />

while older children will respond with another word of the same<br />

grammatical form class, called a paradigmatic association. For<br />

example, to the stimulus word cat the less mature child may<br />

respond with ‘drinks milk’ or ‘nice’; the linguistically more mature<br />

child is likely to respond with ‘dog’ (a noun of the same form)<br />

or ‘animal’ (a noun of a supraordinate category). Or take the<br />

stimulus word begin. The less mature respond with ‘building a<br />

house’, or ‘to cry’ or ‘to eat’, or ‘with’ - all responses showing a<br />

knowledge of how the word is used syntactically. Older children<br />

respond to begin with ‘start’, ‘end’, ‘stop’, <strong>and</strong> the like. Children of<br />

ages 4 <strong>and</strong> 5 are also more apt to give so-called klang associations<br />

than older children, e.g., begin - ‘chin’ or ‘lyn’; cat - ‘sat’ or ‘hat’.<br />

Although preschoolers, of course, have never been exposed to<br />

formal grammar, their word associations <strong>and</strong> their speech reveal<br />

that they have already learned considerable grammar, as indicated<br />

<strong>by</strong> knowledge of pluralization, verb inflections, etc.<br />

Now, what Entwisle (1970) has found in several studies is that<br />

in terms of these very basic developmental milestones in children’s<br />

acquisition of language, low SES Negro children show a more<br />

precocious rate of development than middle SES white children.<br />

She writes: ‘Word associations of black <strong>and</strong> of white elementaryschool<br />

children reveal, contrary to expectations, that slum children<br />

are apparently more advanced linguistically than suburban children<br />

at first grade. . . .’ But here is the interesting point:<br />

White [italics added] first-grade slum children of average IQ<br />

give paradigmatic responses to about the same extent as gifted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!