06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Culture-biased Tests 305<br />

are at the bottom in SES, score only slightly below the whites.<br />

At fourth grade the range of group mean differences on the test<br />

spans more than 2 SDs. Negro fourth graders, on the average,<br />

match the performance of Oriental children in the first grade. These<br />

findings are consistent with results obtained at Yale’s Gesell<br />

Institute using a battery of similar developmental tests with<br />

Grade<br />

Figure 17.2 Oriental (O), white (W), Mexican (M), <strong>and</strong> Negro (N)<br />

groups from socioeconomically urban, largely middle- to uppermiddle<br />

class (U) <strong>and</strong> rural, largely lower- to middle-class (L)<br />

communities. The six groups are ranked from highest (SES 1) to<br />

lowest (SES 6) on a composite index of socioeconomic status.<br />

Negro <strong>and</strong> white elementary school children (Ames & Ilg, 1967).<br />

Especially for children who have been exposed to three or four<br />

years of schooling, such marked differences in performance would<br />

seem most difficult to explain in terms of differential experiences,<br />

motivation, <strong>and</strong> the like.<br />

I have suggested previously that tests which are more culturefair<br />

or status-fair can be thought of as having higher heritability<br />

in an environmentally heterogeneous population than highly<br />

culture- or status-loaded tests (<strong>Jensen</strong>, 1968c, pp. 81-6). Evidence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!