06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Race <strong>Differences</strong> in Intelligence 179<br />

consistent with the threshold hypothesis. But the total evidence<br />

for the hypothesis must still be regarded as quite ambiguous. A<br />

clear finding of an appreciable difference between h2 in the Negro<br />

<strong>and</strong> white populations, however, would be consistent with the<br />

hypothesis depicted in Figures 7*5 <strong>and</strong> 7*6. It could mean, in<br />

effect, that the scale of environmental effects differs for the bulk<br />

of the two populations <strong>and</strong> not simply that the two populations are<br />

distributed about different means on the same additive (i.e., equal<br />

interval) scale of environments. So now we must examine what<br />

meager evidence exists on the estimation of h2 in Negro populations.<br />

Estimations of h2 in Negro Populations<br />

Recognizing that the threshold formulation implies a lower<br />

heritability of IQ in the Negro population if in fact a substantial<br />

proportion of them have been subjected to environmental conditions<br />

in that part of the scale with the largest effects on cognitive<br />

development, V<strong>and</strong>enberg (1970) sought evidence to test this<br />

hypothesis, viz., that there is a greater proportion of environmental<br />

variance in IQs in a Negro (or any environmentally deprived)<br />

population. V<strong>and</strong>enberg estimated heritability <strong>by</strong> comparing MZ<br />

<strong>and</strong> DZ twins. Let us look at the genetic model <strong>and</strong> its assumptions,<br />

which form the basis for this method of estimating<br />

heritability.<br />

The total phenotypic variance,14 Vp, can be partitioned into<br />

two main components: variance attributable to differences (both<br />

genetic <strong>and</strong> environmental) between families (VB) <strong>and</strong> differences<br />

(both genetic <strong>and</strong> environmental) within families (Vw). The<br />

between-families variance (VB) can be partitioned into genetic<br />

<strong>and</strong> environmental components: VBG<strong>and</strong> VBE, respectively.<br />

The model assumes that the total variance is the same for MZ<br />

<strong>and</strong> DZ twins, i.e., VMZ = VDZ. The total variance for DZ twins15<br />

is composed of VDZ = \ V BG+$VWG + VBE + VWE. The total<br />

variance for MZ twins is composed of: VMZ = VBG+ VBE+ V WE.<br />

From the data we can obtain the between <strong>and</strong> within variances for<br />

DZ <strong>and</strong> MZ twins. If we subtract the between-i&vmYits DZ variance<br />

from the fotaumz-families MZ variance, we obtain one-half of the<br />

between-izumlizs genetic variance:<br />

^ bmz = I'bg + Vbe<br />

Vbdz= W b g + V b e<br />

Difference = \ V BG

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!