06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Physical Environment <strong>and</strong> Mental Development 349<br />

‘desirable’, hybrid vigor (e.g., greater size) is said to result. The<br />

effect is quite independent of the effects of loci imbalance involved<br />

in the Bresler study; it is a different phenomenon entirely. The<br />

two effects can operate simultaneously, in ‘opposite’ directions;<br />

the deleterious effects of genetic imbalance can override desirable<br />

effects of heterosis. The opposite of heterosis genetically is inbreeding<br />

depression, which shows up most clearly in consanguineous<br />

matings, such as cousin marriage. Not all traits show<br />

heterosis <strong>and</strong> inbreeding depression. Height <strong>and</strong> chest circumference<br />

show it, as does IQ (Schull & Neel, 1965), but head shape<br />

(cephalic index) <strong>and</strong> circumference apparently do not (Wolanski,<br />

Jarosz & Pyzuk, 1970). Too close inbreeding causes depression<br />

of some characteristics because of the increased likelihood of the<br />

pairing of undesirable mutant alleles, while too much heterogeneity<br />

of ancestral gene pools can have undesirable consequences due to<br />

genetic imbalance caused <strong>by</strong> translocations <strong>and</strong> inversions of loci.<br />

The role of these genetic mechanisms in the causation of reproductive<br />

casualty <strong>and</strong> its differing rates in various subpopulations<br />

calls for much further investigation, which hopefully will not<br />

be hindered <strong>by</strong> ideologically motivated insistence that all such<br />

effects must be attributable entirely to external environmental<br />

factors.<br />

NOTES<br />

1. The locations of these studies: Cape Town, South Africa; Kampala,<br />

Ug<strong>and</strong>a; Guatemala; Mexico; Santiago, Chile; Sarajevo, Yugoslavia;<br />

Hyderabad, India; Peru.<br />

2. In autopsy studies of stillborn <strong>and</strong> newborn infants of poor, presumably<br />

undernourished mothers in New York City, as compared<br />

with infants of non-poor mothers, the magnitude of the effects of<br />

‘poorness’ (presumably maternal undernutrition) on the growth of<br />

various organs <strong>and</strong> body measurements was determined. Of the<br />

eight measurements made on the babies, the brain was least affected,<br />

suggesting that it is probably the nutritionally most highly buffered<br />

organ in the fetus (Naeye, Diener, Dellinger & Blanc, 1969). The<br />

index of relative effect of prenatal undernutrition for the eight<br />

infant body measurements <strong>and</strong> the placenta were: thymus 38,<br />

adrenals 25, spleen 23, heart 15, body length 15, liver 21, kidney 10,<br />

brain 6, <strong>and</strong> placenta 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!