06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Race <strong>Differences</strong> in Intelligence 191<br />

tenth of a normal distribution with an overall mean of 100 <strong>and</strong> a<br />

variance of 168-75. The Negroes <strong>and</strong> whites have the same<br />

distributions of genotypes (column means) in this model. The 12<br />

rows represent environmental categories, which have different<br />

distributions for whites <strong>and</strong> Negroes, based on the 12 socioeconomic<br />

categories of the 1960 U.S. Census (see Figure 7.3). Since the<br />

non-genetic variance is 1 —A2 = 0-25, the environmental component<br />

of IQ variance will be 0-25 x 225 = 56-25, with an overall<br />

mean of 100. The mean IQs of the 12 rows are obtained <strong>by</strong><br />

assuming a normal distribution of environmental effects on IQ<br />

(an assumption which is supported <strong>by</strong> twin studies) <strong>and</strong> dividing<br />

this normal distribution (with mean = 100, variance = 56-25)<br />

into 12 unequal parts with frequencies corresponding to the<br />

Census data. Thus, from the 10 x 12 grid’s row means <strong>and</strong> column<br />

means, assuming additive effects of genetic <strong>and</strong> environmental<br />

factors, one can obtain the mean IQ within each of the 120 cells.<br />

The resultant overall mean IQs for whites <strong>and</strong> Negroes are 100<br />

<strong>and</strong> 91-26, respectively. Since this difference falls short of the<br />

15-points difference that needs to be accounted for, Light <strong>and</strong><br />

Smith introduce the assumption of 1 percent ‘interaction’ variance<br />

into the model.24 This means that low genotypic IQs are more<br />

depressed <strong>by</strong> poor environment than higher genotypic IQs. Light<br />

<strong>and</strong> Smith had a computer find the optimal ‘malicious’ allocation<br />

(as they call it) of Negro genotypes to environmental categories<br />

in producing this 1 percent interaction effect so as to maximize<br />

the overall Negro-white IQ difference. This brings the white <strong>and</strong><br />

Negro means to 100 <strong>and</strong> 86-81, respectively, which is very realistic<br />

in terms of the empirical values of white <strong>and</strong> Negro mean IQs.<br />

Light <strong>and</strong> Smith went further <strong>and</strong> assumed a 10 percent interaction<br />

due to ‘malicious’ allocation of poor genotypes in poor<br />

environments; the optimal allocation of 10 percent interaction<br />

effects <strong>by</strong> the computer to maximize the white-Negro difference<br />

resulted in mean IQs of 100 <strong>and</strong> 82-59. Light <strong>and</strong> Smith state:<br />

‘We may therefore conclude that with an interaction component<br />

of variance somewhere between 0-01 <strong>and</strong> 0-10, the black mean IQ<br />

may be expected to be approximately 85, even though blacks are<br />

distributed identically with whites over the genetic categories’<br />

(1969, p. 498). Thus, the claim is made that this environmental<br />

allocation model can accept the available heritability estimates for<br />

IQ <strong>and</strong>, <strong>by</strong> assuming a small interaction component of between

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!