06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

358 <strong>Educability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Differences</strong><br />

of its genes from Caucasian ancestors. Methods exist for probabilistically<br />

estimating the proportion of Caucasian genes in a hybrid<br />

Negro population <strong>and</strong> in individuals in such a population, based<br />

on a dozen or more genetic polymorphisms (various proteins in<br />

the blood) with known frequencies in West African <strong>and</strong> European<br />

populations. If in environmentally homogeneous samples there<br />

was a higher correlation between IQ <strong>and</strong> the proportion of Caucasian<br />

ancestry than between IQ <strong>and</strong> socially visible racial characteristics<br />

which can be objectively measured, such as skin color <strong>and</strong><br />

interpupillary distance, a strictly environmental hypothesis of the<br />

IQ difference would not be upheld. If maternal half-siblings were<br />

used in such research, even prenatal environmental effects would<br />

be controlled. The method used in this way could probably be<br />

more definitive than any other method or combination of methods<br />

presently available, short of long-term longitudinal studies in which<br />

all environmental factors could be rigorously controlled throughout<br />

the course of development from the time of conception.<br />

DEFICIENCIES OF MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL HYPOTHESES<br />

Those environmentalist hypotheses of the Negro-white IQ difference<br />

which have been most clearly formulated <strong>and</strong> are therefore<br />

subject to empirical tests are the only ones that can be evaluated<br />

within a scientific framework. The most frequently cited environmentalist<br />

hypotheses which are sufficiently clear to be put to an<br />

empirical test <strong>and</strong> which already have been tested have not<br />

proven adequate to the explanatory function they were intended<br />

to serve. A number of lines of such evidence cast serious doubt<br />

on purely environmental <strong>and</strong> cultural theories of the racial IQ<br />

difference.<br />

Socioeconomic <strong>Differences</strong><br />

Matching or statistically controlling socioeconomic status (SES)<br />

of racial samples does not wipe out IQ differences, although on the<br />

average it reduces differences <strong>by</strong> about one-third. The racial<br />

difference increases with increasing SES level when the IQs being<br />

compared are those of children classified according to their parents’<br />

SES. This finding is hard to rationalize along purely environmental<br />

lines, but it is predictable from the genetic principle of filial<br />

regression toward the population mean. Children of high SES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!