06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

272 <strong>Educability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Differences</strong><br />

sensitivity to teacher <strong>and</strong> experimenter differences than is found<br />

with intelligence or achievement tests. The Making Xs test was<br />

given to all the fourth, fifth, <strong>and</strong> sixth graders in an urban school<br />

system (1,588 whites <strong>and</strong> 1,242 Negroes). At each grade level, the<br />

Negro mean score was equal to or slightly higher than the white,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the gain from Part I to Part II was significantly higher for<br />

Negroes than for whites. Thus, on this non-cognitive, motivationsensitive<br />

test there is no evidence that Negro children perform less<br />

well than white children; if anything, just the opposite is true. The<br />

same tester, in the same session, also administered a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

verbal <strong>and</strong> non-verbal intelligence test to all these children. The<br />

average white-Negro differences in sigma units (based on the<br />

white SD) were 1-63 for the verbal IQ <strong>and</strong> 1*70 for the non-verbal<br />

IQ (<strong>Jensen</strong> & Rohwer, 1970, pp. 55-71). (These differences are<br />

equivalent to about 26 <strong>and</strong> 27 IQ points.)<br />

It is sometimes claimed that lower performance on IQ tests results<br />

from poor attention, distractability, carelessness, inability to follow<br />

directions, <strong>and</strong> the like. So a test was devised to measure these<br />

factors independently of intellectual ability per se. The test makes<br />

no dem<strong>and</strong>s on knowledge, g, or memory. It is called a Listening-<br />

Attention Test. It is administered in the classroom <strong>by</strong> means of a<br />

tape recorder. High scores on the Listening-Attention Test<br />

indicate that the subject is able to hear <strong>and</strong> distinguish correctly<br />

the numbers spoken <strong>by</strong> the voice on the tape, <strong>and</strong> to follow<br />

directions, keep pace with the examiner, <strong>and</strong> mark the answer<br />

sheet properly. The procedure is quite simple. The child is provided<br />

with a two-page answer booklet containing columns of paired<br />

numerals, ten pairs to a column; each column is headed <strong>by</strong> a<br />

capital letter, alphabetically beginning with A. A clear male voice<br />

from the recorder says, ‘Put the point of your pencil on the letter<br />

A. Now, I am going to say one number in each pair, <strong>and</strong> you<br />

should cross out the number I say - cross it out with an X. Ready<br />

2 -4 -8 - 9 - 3 - ,’ etc. The numbers are spoken at a 2-second<br />

rate. At the beginning of each series (ten in all), the subject is told<br />

to put his pencil on the letter at the top of the list. This test, too,<br />

was given to all fourth, fifth, <strong>and</strong> sixth graders (1,423 whites,<br />

1,214 Negroes) in an urban school system. There was no significant<br />

white-Negro difference in mean scores on this test at any grade<br />

level (<strong>Jensen</strong> & Rohwer, 1970, pp. 58-60).<br />

It might be argued, however, that children perceive whether a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!