06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 <strong>Educability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Differences</strong><br />

without time limit, although most children finish in 10 to 15<br />

minutes. The test is best regarded as a developmental scale of<br />

mental ability. It correlates substantially with other IQ tests, but<br />

it is considerably less culture-loaded than most usual IQ tests. It<br />

is primarily a measure of general cognitive development <strong>and</strong> not<br />

just of perceptual-motor ability. Children taking the test are urged<br />

Figure 3.1 The ten simple geometric forms used in the Figure<br />

Copying Test. In the actual test booklet each figure is presented<br />

singly in the top half of a 5^" x 8^" sheet. The circle is If" in<br />

diameter.<br />

to attempt to copy every figure. Ability to succeed on a more<br />

difficult item in the age scale is not functionally dependent upon<br />

success on previous items in the sense that the easier item is a<br />

prerequisite component of the more difficult item. By contrast,<br />

skill in short division is a component of skill in long division. The<br />

age differential for some tasks such as figure copying <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Piagetian conservation tests is so marked as to suggest that they<br />

depend upon the sequential maturation of hierarchical neural

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!