06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Heritability of Scholastic Achievement 107<br />

School differences <strong>and</strong> teacher differences are more strongly<br />

reflected in those school subjects which are least apt to be taught<br />

or practised at home under parental supervision. Parents probably<br />

pay more attention to their children’s reading <strong>and</strong> have more<br />

influence over it than any other subject, <strong>and</strong> therefore there should<br />

be relatively smaller sibling differences in reading skills. When<br />

parents pay little attention to children’s scholastic progress, the<br />

environmental component of sibling differences is a function of<br />

teacher differences <strong>and</strong>, if siblings have different teachers or attend<br />

different schools with somewhat different curricula, there will be<br />

little or no sibling correlation between the specific environmental<br />

influences on their learning of school subjects.<br />

Still another factor affecting the h2 of achievement is the degree<br />

of correspondence between the school’s curriculum <strong>and</strong> the subject<br />

content of the achievement tests. There is sometimes very poor<br />

correspondence between what is actually taught in class <strong>and</strong> what<br />

is assessed <strong>by</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ardized achievement tests. Such discrepancies<br />

can either attenuate estimates of h2 for scholastic achievement,<br />

or can leave the outcome ambiguous <strong>by</strong> causing the achievement<br />

test to become a measure of incidental learning in <strong>and</strong> out of<br />

school, rather than intentional learning in the classroom, there<strong>by</strong><br />

resembling more a general intelligence test. One of the characteristics<br />

of the more intelligent children is that they are better<br />

incidental learners; they somehow pick up <strong>and</strong> retain much more<br />

information than is directly taught to them or than they learn<br />

intentionally.<br />

Thus, unlike the heritability of intelligence, the heritability of<br />

scholastic achievement as it is usually estimated is so conditional<br />

upon a large variety of other variables as to be a rather unstable<br />

datum.<br />

FAMILY INFLUENCES ON SCHOLASTIC ACHIEVEMENT<br />

One reflection of the relative environmental influences of the family<br />

<strong>and</strong> of the school on children’s scholastic achievement is the<br />

magnitude of the intraclass correlation among full siblings. The<br />

total variance in test scores, cr2, is analyzable into two main<br />

components: (a) variance between families,1 <strong>and</strong> (b) variance<br />

within families (c 2,). Thus, a2 = Og + c 2,. The intraclass correlation,<br />

rf, among siblings is2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!