06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 <strong>Educability</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Group</strong> <strong>Differences</strong><br />

differences may involve genetic as well as experientially derived<br />

variation. A sharp dichotomy in our causal account of individual<br />

<strong>and</strong> group differences seems to me to be scientifically unwarranted,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to act as if such a dichotomy exists, when it is unlikely that it<br />

accords with the true state of nature, would seem to me to be<br />

undesirable. <strong>Group</strong>s are the result of classification, whether in<br />

terms of geographic origin of one’s ancestors, visible physical<br />

characteristics, socioeconomic status, occupation, sex, or whatever<br />

- it can be quite arbitrary. Although average group differences in<br />

any characteristic are really just an average of individual differences<br />

classified <strong>by</strong> some particular rule, when viewed in this collective<br />

form they can appear quite troublesome if the behavioral characteristic<br />

in question is socially valued <strong>and</strong> differentially rewarded<br />

<strong>by</strong> the economic system, <strong>and</strong> especially if the mean differences<br />

between groups are large relative to individual differences within<br />

groups. The problems are magnified when group membership is<br />

rigidly imposed <strong>and</strong> the group identity of individuals is highly<br />

visible, as in the case of physical characteristics associated with<br />

racial classification.<br />

Race differences <strong>and</strong> social class differences, therefore, are<br />

essentially more a social problem than a scientific one. But they<br />

are there, nevertheless, <strong>and</strong> society dem<strong>and</strong>s that they be dealt<br />

with in many spheres of public concern, <strong>and</strong> perhaps more in<br />

education than in anything else. If this is the case, then attempting<br />

to bring scientific knowledge <strong>and</strong> methods to bear upon underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

the nature of group differences would seem most appropriate.<br />

At the same time, we should not let the fact of group<br />

differences make us lose sight of the more fundamental fact of<br />

individual differences. The problem of the importance of intelligence<br />

in schools as they are presently constituted is not primarily<br />

a problem of any particular minority group within our population.<br />

Although the average IQ of the Negro population of the United<br />

States, for example, is about one st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation (i.e. 15 IQ<br />

points) below that of the white population, because of the disproportionate<br />

sizes of the Negro <strong>and</strong> white populations there are more<br />

whites with IQs below the Negro average than there are Negroes.<br />

It is only when society is ideologically, politically <strong>and</strong> economically<br />

sensitive to its classifications of persons into socially identifiable<br />

groups that unequal percentages of different groups in, say, special<br />

classes for the academically gifted <strong>and</strong> the educationally retarded

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!