06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Social Class <strong>Differences</strong> in Intelligence 155<br />

polation from our experiment, or indeed from any other animal<br />

experiment, must be made only with extreme caution.<br />

Nevertheless, we do feel that our experiment is relevant to<br />

the human situation inasmuch as it strengthens the expectation<br />

that social mobility related to a heritable variable will give rise<br />

to some genetic difference between class means despite strong<br />

parent-offspring environmental correlation. We therefore believe<br />

that our experimental results support those who hold the view<br />

that neither cultural nor genetic approaches alone are likely<br />

to lead to adequate explanations of social class phenomena.<br />

(Thoday & Gibson, 1970, p. 992)<br />

If the environmentalist hypothesis that there is no genetic component<br />

to social class intelligence differences were true, it would<br />

mean that all the factors involved in social mobility, educational<br />

attainments, <strong>and</strong> the selection of persons into various occupations<br />

have managed scrupulously to screen out all variance associated<br />

with genetic factors among individuals in various occupational<br />

<strong>and</strong> social strata. The probability that the selection processes have<br />

led to there being only environmental variance in intelligence<br />

among various socioeconomic groups <strong>and</strong> occupations - a result<br />

that could probably not be accomplished even <strong>by</strong> making an<br />

explicit effort toward this goal - is so unlikely that the argument<br />

amounts to a reductio ad absurdum. If individual differences in<br />

intelligence are due largely to genetic factors, then it is virtually<br />

impossible that the average intelligence differences between social<br />

classes (defined <strong>by</strong> educational <strong>and</strong> occupational criteria) do not<br />

include a genetic component.<br />

The statistical argument goes as follows: The correlation between<br />

phenotypes (the measurable characteristic) <strong>and</strong> genotypes (the<br />

genetic basis of the phenotype) is the square root of the heritability,<br />

or h. An average estimate of h for intelligence in European <strong>and</strong><br />

North American Caucasian populations is 0-90. An estimate of the<br />

average correlation between occupational status <strong>and</strong> IQ is 0-50. A<br />

purely environmentalist position says that the correlation between<br />

IQ <strong>and</strong> occupation (or SES) is due entirely to the environmental<br />

component of IQ variance. In other words, this hypothesis requires<br />

that the correlation between genotypes <strong>and</strong> SES be zero. So we<br />

have correlations between three sets of variables: (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!