06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Intelligence <strong>and</strong> <strong>Educability</strong> 87<br />

used as the base from which gains were computed.) This finding<br />

is consistent with the simplex model. Very little of the gain in a<br />

year’s interval becomes consolidated as status. If it did, we should<br />

expect a much higher correlation between independent measures<br />

of status <strong>and</strong> of gain. Moreover, if a large r<strong>and</strong>om element did not<br />

enter into the short-term gains we should expect consistent<br />

individual differences in gains from one interval to the next <strong>and</strong><br />

consequently substantial correlations between gains from one<br />

interval to the next. But this in fact is not the case. Thorndike<br />

gives the average correlation between two independent gain scores<br />

on intelligence tests for different intervals:<br />

1-year interval = 0-101<br />

2-year interval = 0-240<br />

3-year interval = 0-266<br />

4-year interval = 0-188<br />

5-year interval = 0-265<br />

The longer the interval, of course, the larger is the proportion of<br />

the gain that has been consolidated <strong>and</strong> therefore the larger the<br />

correlations between gains over longer intervals. The same effect<br />

is reflected in the average correlations of initial status with gain<br />

based on experimentally independent tests:<br />

1-year interval = 0-045<br />

2-year interval = 0*006<br />

3-year interval = 0-031<br />

4-year interval = 0-139<br />

5-year interval = 0-329<br />

These actual correlations are even smaller <strong>and</strong> somewhat less<br />

regular than would be predicted from the simplex model, probably<br />

because of measurement error, slightly changing factorial composition<br />

of the tests at different levels of difficulty (<strong>and</strong> thus at different<br />

ages), <strong>and</strong> unequal units of measurement over the full range of<br />

scores.<br />

Another fact to be considered in this model is the heritability of<br />

the trait under consideration. This is quite high for intelligence<br />

<strong>and</strong> vocabulary, but lower for scholastic achievement, particularly<br />

in the elementary grades <strong>and</strong> for subjects such as spelling <strong>and</strong><br />

mechanical arithmetic. Of all the growth characters on which<br />

there are good data, the highest heritability is for height. What

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!